2018-19 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
Cornell 34 21 16-3-2 0.810 73 31 28 19-3-6 0.786 97 46 8-1-1 Won 3
Princeton 33 21 15-3-3 0.786 83 38 28 18-5-5 0.732 102 55 6-3-1 Lost 2
Clarkson 32 21 16-5 0.762 80 35 33 25-7-1 0.773 127 62 8-2 Won 2
Colgate 31 21 14-4-3 0.738 79 47 33 20-8-5 0.682 118 83 7-2-1 Won 4
St. Lawrence 22 21 8-7-6 0.524 49 46 33 13-13-7 0.500 71 77 3-2-5 Tied 2
Rensselaer 21 21 10-10-1 0.500 31 53 33 13-15-5 0.470 44 76 4-5-1 Lost 1
Harvard 21 21 9-9-3 0.500 44 39 28 11-13-4 0.464 63 55 6-2-2 Tied 1
Quinnipiac 21 21 9-9-3 0.500 51 39 33 12-16-5 0.439 69 65 5-3-2 Tied 1
Yale 16 21 7-12-2 0.381 47 59 28 8-18-2 0.321 60 85 3-5-2 Won 1
Dartmouth 9 21 4-16-1 0.214 29 65 28 5-21-2 0.214 38 87 2-7-1 Lost 1
Brown 7 21 2-16-3 0.167 31 87 28 5-20-3 0.232 46 108 0-9-1 Tied 1
Union 5 21 2-18-1 0.119 26 84 33 4-27-2 0.152 42 127 2-8 Lost 3
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 9-1
W, 6-0
L, 4-3
W, 4-0
L, 4-3
W, 4-1
W, 5-2

W, 4-0
T, 3-3
W, 7-2
W, 8-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-2
W, 1-0
W, 1-0
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-1
Clarkson
L, 9-1
L, 6-0
XXX W, 4-1
W, 4-3
W, 3-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-2
W, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-2

L, 3-0
L, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
L, 5-1
L, 6-0
W, 5-1
L, 5-1
Colgate
W, 4-3
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
L, 4-3
XXX W, 4-2
W, 4-2
L, 6-0
L, 5-1
L, 1-0
L, 4-2
W, 6-0
T, 4-4
T, 3-3
L, 5-2
L, 4-1

L, 5-1
T, 2-2
L, 5-2
L, 5-2
L, 5-2
L, 6-3
Cornell
W, 4-3
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-0
L, 4-2
L, 4-2
XXX L, 4-0
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
L, 6-0
T, 2-2
W, 5-0
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 5-0
L, 8-2
L, 4-0
T, 1-1
L, 7-0

L, 4-3
L, 4-0
Dartmouth
L, 5-2

W, 4-2
L, 3-2
W, 6-0
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-0
XXX W, 3-1
W, 1-0
W, 4-1
W, 5-2
L, 3-2
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-2
W, 3-2
T, 0-0
L, 4-2
W, 4-1
W, 2-0
W, 1-0
Harvard
L, 4-0
T, 3-3
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
W, 1-0
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
W, 6-0
L, 3-1
L, 1-0
XXX T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
W, 1-0
L, 2-0
L, 2-1
T, 0-0
L, 4-2
L, 4-0
L, 5-1
L, 5-2

Princeton
L, 7-2
L, 8-2
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
L, 6-0
T, 4-4
T, 2-2
L, 5-0
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
XXX L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-3

L, 4-0
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-2
Quinnipiac
L, 4-0
L, 4-2
W, 3-2

T, 3-3
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 5-1
L, 1-0
L, 1-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
XXX W, 1-0
L, 4-0
W, 5-4
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-0
L, 2-0
T, 2-2
Rensselaer
L, 1-0
L, 1-0
W, 3-0
W, 5-1
W, 4-1

W, 5-0
W, 8-2
L, 2-1
L, 5-2
W, 2-0
W, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
L, 1-0
W, 4-0
XXX W, 5-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
T, 1-1
St. Lawrence
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 4-0
W, 3-1
W, 5-1
T, 2-2
W, 4-0
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
T, 0-0
T, 0-0
W, 4-2
W, 4-3

L, 5-4
T, 2-2
L, 5-0
W, 3-2
XXX L, 3-0
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-1
Union
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
W, 5-1
W, 6-0
W, 5-2
W, 5-2
W, 7-0

W, 4-2
L, 4-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 5-0
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 4-2
XXX W, 6-1
W, 4-2
Yale
L, 5-2
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
W, 5-1
W, 5-2
W, 6-3
W, 4-3
W, 4-0
L, 2-0
L, 1-0
W, 5-2

W, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 2-0
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
T, 1-1
W, 3-1
W, 5-1
L, 6-1
L, 4-2
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.