2017-18 Standings Presented by U.S. Army ROTC

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
1. (1) Clarkson 38 22 19-3 0.864 90 29 41 36-4-1 0.890 158 48 10-0 Won 10
1. (t) Colgate 38 22 19-3 0.864 80 36 41 34-6-1 0.841 150 71 8-2 Lost 1
3. Cornell 32 22 15-5-2 0.727 67 42 33 21-9-3 0.682 101 65 8-2 Lost 1
4. St. Lawrence 30 22 14-6-2 0.682 67 40 35 20-11-4 0.629 96 73 6-3-1 Lost 1
5. Quinnipiac 25 22 12-9-1 0.568 41 40 36 16-17-3 0.486 65 71 3-6-1 Lost 3
6. Princeton 23 22 11-10-1 0.523 60 43 32 14-14-4 0.500 79 64 6-4 Lost 1
7. Harvard 22 22 10-10-2 0.500 52 48 31 13-16-2 0.452 79 88 4-5-1 Lost 3
8. Yale 18 22 8-12-2 0.409 43 53 31 10-17-4 0.387 59 83 3-7 Lost 2
9. Rensselaer 15 22 6-13-3 0.341 35 50 34 9-19-6 0.353 54 78 2-7-1 Lost 3
10. Union 12 22 5-15-2 0.273 45 78 34 7-22-5 0.279 65 121 1-7-2 Lost 2
11. Dartmouth 9 22 3-16-3 0.205 25 77 27 5-19-3 0.241 37 98 1-7-2 Lost 2
12. Brown 2 22 1-21 0.045 31 100 29 2-27-0 0.069 46 134 0-10 Lost 15
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 11-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-3
W, 2-0
W, 5-1
W, 6-1
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
W, 6-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 6-3
W, 5-1
W, 6-3
W, 5-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-0
Clarkson
L, 11-1
L, 4-0
XXX W, 4-3
L, 5-3
L, 6-0
L, 4-3
L, 8-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-0
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
L, 2-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 7-3
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
Colgate
L, 5-3
L, 2-0
L, 4-3
W, 5-3
XXX W, 3-1
L, 5-4
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 2-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 5-0
L, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 6-1
L, 6-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
Cornell
L, 5-1
L, 6-1
W, 6-0
W, 4-3
L, 3-1
W, 5-4
XXX L, 2-0
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
L, 5-2
W, 4-0
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
L, 5-0
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
Dartmouth
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 8-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-1
XXX W, 4-1
W, 1-0
W, 8-1
W, 3-2
L, 1-0
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
T, 1-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-0
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 5-1
W, 6-0
Harvard
L, 6-3
L, 6-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
XXX L, 3-2
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 5-2
W, 3-0
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
Princeton
L, 4-0
L, 5-2
W, 4-0
L, 2-0
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 8-1
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
XXX L, 3-0
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-2
T, 4-4
W, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
Quinnipiac
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 2-0
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 4-0
W, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-0
L, 3-1
XXX L, 2-1
L, 2-0
W, 4-2
T, 1-1
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
W, 2-0
W, 2-0
Rensselaer
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 5-0
W, 3-2
W, 1-0
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
XXX W, 1-0
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
St. Lawrence
L, 6-3
L, 5-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-0
L, 5-0
L, 3-0
W, 2-1
T, 4-4
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
T, 1-1
L, 1-0
L, 5-1
XXX L, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
Union
L, 6-3
L, 5-1
W, 5-1
W, 7-3
W, 6-1
W, 6-1
T, 3-3
W, 5-0
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
XXX L, 3-1
W, 5-4
Yale
L, 4-2
L, 3-0
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-0
L, 5-1
L, 6-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
L, 2-0
L, 2-0
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-4
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.