2016-17 ECAC Women's Hockey Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
Clarkson 40 22 19-1-2 0.909 91 32 41 32-4-5 0.841 146 63 10-0 Won 11
St. Lawrence 35 22 16-3-3 0.795 75 30 36 26-6-4 0.778 115 58 5-3-2 Lost 2
Cornell 31 22 13-4-5 0.705 56 36 34 20-9-5 0.662 82 57 5-3-2 Lost 2
Princeton 30 22 14-6-2 0.682 69 33 33 20-10-3 0.652 104 63 6-4 Lost 1
Quinnipiac 29 22 13-6-3 0.659 64 28 37 21-10-6 0.649 94 51 5-4-1 Lost 2
Colgate 27 22 13-8-1 0.614 59 47 36 22-11-3 0.653 105 67 6-4 Lost 4
Yale 18 22 8-12-2 0.409 46 58 31 10-17-4 0.387 69 83 3-6-1 Lost 5
Rensselaer 15 22 7-14-1 0.341 39 73 36 10-24-2 0.306 62 117 1-9 Lost 4
Harvard 14 22 5-13-4 0.318 37 51 29 5-19-5 0.259 52 77 2-5-3 Lost 1
Brown 10 22 5-17 0.227 33 98 29 7-22-0 0.241 56 126 3-7 Won 2
Dartmouth 10 22 5-17 0.227 27 56 28 7-21-0 0.250 38 73 2-8 Won 1
Union 5 22 2-19-1 0.114 21 75 34 5-28-1 0.162 38 111 1-8-1 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 8-1
W, 8-1
W, 3-0
W, 7-3
W, 4-0
W, 5-1
L, 1-0
L, 5-2
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-0
W, 6-1
W, 8-0
W, 9-0
W, 4-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-0
W, 7-2
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
W, 2-1
W, 4-2
Clarkson
L, 8-1
L, 8-1
XXX L, 2-1
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
L, 5-4
L, 6-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
T, 2-2
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
L, 8-3
L, 4-2
T, 3-3
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-2
Colgate
L, 3-0
L, 7-3
W, 2-1
W, 5-2
XXX L, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 6-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-0
W, 7-2
W, 5-1
W, 3-1
W, 2-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-3
W, 3-0
L, 2-0
L, 4-1
L, 4-3
L, 3-1
Cornell
L, 4-0
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
W, 5-4
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
XXX L, 2-1
L, 1-0
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
T, 1-1
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 1-0
L, 3-2
W, 5-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-1
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
Dartmouth
W, 1-0
W, 5-2
W, 6-1
W, 3-0
W, 2-1
W, 6-1
W, 2-1
W, 1-0
XXX W, 5-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-0
W, 2-0
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
L, 4-1
Harvard
L, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 4-0
T, 2-2
T, 3-3
W, 4-0
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
XXX W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 2-0
W, 3-2
L, 5-0
Princeton
L, 4-0
L, 6-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-1
L, 7-2
L, 5-1
W, 2-1
T, 1-1
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
XXX L, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
L, 4-2
W, 3-1
L, 4-2
L, 7-0
L, 4-1
T, 1-1
W, 3-1
Quinnipiac
L, 8-0
L, 9-0
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
L, 3-1
L, 2-0
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
XXX L, 6-1
L, 5-0
W, 1-0
T, 1-1
L, 4-0
L, 1-0
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
Rensselaer
L, 4-1
L, 4-3
W, 8-3
W, 4-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-0
L, 1-0
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-0
L, 3-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-2
W, 6-1
W, 5-0
XXX W, 4-1
W, 5-2
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 7-2
L, 2-1
St. Lawrence
L, 5-0
L, 7-2
T, 3-3
W, 4-1
W, 4-3
L, 3-0
L, 5-2
T, 2-2
L, 2-0
L, 2-1
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-2
L, 1-0
T, 1-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
XXX L, 4-0
L, 8-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
Union
W, 3-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-1
W, 3-1
W, 2-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 2-0
W, 7-0
W, 4-1
W, 4-0
W, 1-0
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-0
W, 8-1
XXX W, 5-1
W, 2-0
Yale
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 4-3
W, 3-1
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 5-0
T, 1-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
L, 7-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.