2010-11 ECAC Women's Hockey Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
Cornell 41 22 20-1-1 0.932 99 20 35 31-3-1 0.900 157 39 8-2 Lost 1
Harvard 31 22 14-5-3 0.705 68 43 32 17-11-4 0.594 97 76 5-3-2 Lost 1
Dartmouth 30 22 15-7 0.682 74 51 34 22-12-0 0.647 112 81 7-3 Lost 2
Princeton 27 22 13-8-1 0.614 51 42 31 16-14-1 0.532 68 64 6-4 Lost 2
Quinnipiac 25 22 12-9-1 0.568 58 43 37 22-12-3 0.635 105 63 5-3-2 Lost 1
Clarkson 24 22 10-8-4 0.545 50 46 37 14-17-6 0.459 76 85 3-4-3 Lost 2
St. Lawrence 22 22 11-11 0.500 51 48 36 16-18-2 0.472 90 96 4-6 Lost 2
Rensselaer 18 22 8-12-2 0.409 43 55 35 10-18-7 0.386 63 97 1-8-1 Lost 6
Colgate 18 22 8-12-2 0.409 39 62 33 11-19-3 0.379 63 95 4-5-1 Lost 2
Yale 18 22 8-12-2 0.409 42 54 29 9-17-3 0.362 52 73 4-5-1 Lost 1
Brown 6 22 1-17-4 0.136 28 81 29 2-23-4 0.138 38 114 0-9-1 Tied 1
Union 4 22 1-19-2 0.091 18 76 34 2-29-3 0.103 33 109 1-9 Lost 4
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX T, 1-1
W, 5-3
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-0
W, 8-0
W, 4-2
W, 6-0
W, 4-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-0
W, 4-2
W, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 1-0
W, 4-2
W, 5-2
W, 4-2
T, 1-1
W, 3-2

W, 4-0
W, 4-2
Clarkson
T, 1-1
L, 5-3
XXX W, 5-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-0
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
Colgate
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
T, 2-2
XXX W, 6-1
W, 5-0
W, 6-2
W, 4-3
W, 3-1
W, 7-0
W, 2-0
L, 2-0
L, 2-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-4
L, 2-0
W, 5-3
W, 4-2
L, 1-0
L, 1-0
W, 3-1
L, 1-0
Cornell
L, 3-0
L, 8-0
L, 3-0
T, 3-3
L, 6-1
L, 5-0
XXX L, 6-1
W, 4-2
L, 3-0
L, 4-3
L, 5-1
L, 1-0
L, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 6-1
L, 6-0
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 8-0
L, 5-0
L, 7-1
Dartmouth
L, 4-2
L, 6-0
W, 3-2
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
L, 4-3
W, 6-1
L, 4-2
XXX W, 5-3
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 7-0
L, 4-3
W, 4-0
W, 5-2
L, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
Harvard
L, 4-2
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
T, 3-3
L, 3-1
L, 7-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-3
L, 5-3
L, 3-2
XXX T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 5-0
L, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 5-3
Princeton
L, 4-0
L, 4-2
L, 2-0
W, 3-2
L, 2-0
W, 2-0
W, 5-1
W, 1-0
W, 3-2
W, 7-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
XXX W, 5-2
L, 3-0
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
Quinnipiac
L, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-0
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 5-2
W, 3-0
XXX W, 2-0
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
W, 1-0
Rensselaer
W, 1-0
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 5-4
W, 2-0
W, 6-1
W, 6-0
L, 5-2
W, 3-0
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-2
L, 2-0
W, 5-1
XXX L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
St. Lawrence
L, 5-2
L, 4-2
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 5-3
L, 4-2
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
XXX L, 1-0
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
L, 2-0
Union
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-0
W, 1-0
W, 1-0
W, 4-2
W, 8-0
W, 4-1
W, 5-1
W, 5-0
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 1-0
W, 4-0
XXX W, 4-1
W, 5-0
Yale

L, 4-0
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 1-0
W, 5-0
W, 7-1
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 5-3
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
L, 1-0
W, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
W, 2-0
L, 4-1
L, 5-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.