2019-20 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
Harvard 10 5 5-0 1.000 27 7 5 5-0-0 1.000 27 7 5-0 Won 5
Cornell 8 4 4-0 1.000 20 6 6 6-0-0 1.000 29 10 6-0 Won 6
Dartmouth 7 5 3-1-1 0.700 16 14 6 3-2-1 0.583 20 19 3-2-1 Won 3
Clarkson 6 4 3-1 0.750 14 7 12 8-3-1 0.708 37 24 7-3 Won 1
Quinnipiac 5 4 2-1-1 0.625 9 11 11 6-4-1 0.591 29 31 5-4-1 Won 2
Rensselaer 5 6 2-3-1 0.417 14 13 10 4-5-1 0.450 31 28 4-5-1 Lost 1
Brown 4 6 2-4 0.333 14 17 6 2-4-0 0.333 14 17 2-4 Lost 2
Colgate 4 4 2-2 0.500 8 11 12 3-6-3 0.375 20 31 3-4-3 Lost 1
Union 4 6 2-4 0.333 10 15 14 3-11-0 0.214 21 44 3-7 Won 1
St. Lawrence 2 4 1-3 0.250 7 18 12 3-8-1 0.292 22 40 2-7-1 Lost 2
Yale 2 6 1-5 0.167 11 25 6 1-5-0 0.167 11 25 1-5 Lost 5
Princeton 1 4 0-3-1 0.125 4 10 6 1-3-2 0.333 14 18 1-3-2 Lost 1
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX

L, 4-1

W, 4-1

W, 4-1

W, 4-1











W, 3-2
L, 5-1
Clarkson


XXX L, 5-1

W, 4-2









L, 2-1



L, 5-1



Colgate
W, 4-1

W, 5-1

XXX











L, 4-1



L, 2-1

Cornell
L, 4-1

L, 4-2



XXX









L, 6-1



L, 6-2

Dartmouth
L, 4-1







XXX W, 7-3

L, 3-1

T, 2-2







L, 4-3

Harvard
L, 4-1







L, 7-3

XXX L, 3-0

L, 7-2







L, 6-1

Princeton








W, 3-1

W, 3-0

XXX

T, 2-2



W, 2-1



Quinnipiac








T, 2-2

W, 7-2



XXX L, 3-1



L, 2-1



Rensselaer


W, 2-1









T, 2-2

W, 3-1

XXX L, 6-2

L, 3-2
W, 2-1


St. Lawrence




W, 4-1

W, 6-1









W, 6-2

XXX L, 3-2



Union


W, 5-1









L, 2-1

W, 2-1

W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-2

XXX

Yale
L, 3-2
W, 5-1


W, 2-1

W, 6-2

W, 4-3

W, 6-1











XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.