2019-20 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
Clarkson 20 13 10-3 0.769 40 22 23 16-5-2 0.739 69 43 7-2-1 Won 1
Cornell 17 10 8-1-1 0.850 37 14 17 13-1-3 0.853 60 25 6-1-3 Won 1
Dartmouth 15 11 7-3-1 0.682 30 31 18 10-5-3 0.639 56 55 6-2-2 Won 3
Harvard 15 12 7-4-1 0.625 47 32 17 9-6-2 0.588 66 46 3-5-2 Lost 1
Quinnipiac 15 12 7-4-1 0.625 34 29 22 13-8-1 0.614 60 56 7-3 Won 1
Rensselaer 15 15 7-7-1 0.500 33 33 23 10-12-1 0.457 57 64 5-5 Lost 1
Colgate 13 10 6-3-1 0.650 25 23 22 8-10-4 0.455 45 54 5-4-1 Lost 1
Yale 12 12 6-6 0.500 33 34 17 8-9-0 0.471 42 54 6-3 Won 2
Union 9 14 4-9-1 0.321 27 37 24 6-17-1 0.271 41 70 3-6-1 Lost 2
Brown 8 12 4-8 0.333 23 33 19 4-15-0 0.211 32 57 1-9 Won 1
Princeton 5 12 1-8-3 0.208 19 33 19 3-12-4 0.263 37 57 2-7-1 Won 1
St. Lawrence 2 13 1-12 0.077 21 48 25 3-19-3 0.180 44 85 0-8-2 Lost 7
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 2-1

L, 4-1

W, 4-1

W, 4-1

W, 4-1





W, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-2

W, 5-0
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 5-1
Clarkson
L, 2-1

XXX L, 5-1

W, 4-2

W, 3-2

L, 5-3

L, 2-1

L, 5-2

L, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-1

L, 5-1
L, 2-0
L, 4-1

Colgate
W, 4-1

W, 5-1

XXX

L, 5-1

L, 4-3

T, 2-2

L, 3-1

W, 3-0

L, 4-1

L, 3-2

L, 2-1

Cornell
L, 4-1

L, 4-2



XXX W, 2-1

L, 3-1

L, 5-1

L, 2-1

L, 3-0

L, 6-1

T, 3-3

L, 6-2

Dartmouth
L, 4-1

L, 3-2

W, 5-1

L, 2-1

XXX W, 7-3

L, 3-1
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-1


L, 3-1



L, 4-3

Harvard
L, 4-1

W, 5-3

W, 4-3

W, 3-1

L, 7-3

XXX L, 3-0
T, 3-3
L, 7-2
W, 6-1
L, 6-3

L, 3-1



L, 6-1

Princeton


W, 2-1

T, 2-2

W, 5-1

W, 3-1
W, 4-3
W, 3-0
T, 3-3
XXX W, 3-1
W, 4-3
T, 2-2

L, 1-0

W, 2-1



Quinnipiac


W, 5-2

W, 3-1

W, 2-1

T, 2-2
L, 5-1
W, 7-2
L, 6-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
XXX L, 3-1

L, 3-2

L, 2-1



Rensselaer
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-0

W, 3-0



W, 6-3

T, 2-2

W, 3-1

XXX L, 6-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
St. Lawrence
W, 3-2

W, 3-1

W, 4-1

W, 6-1

W, 3-1

W, 3-1

W, 1-0

W, 3-2

W, 6-2
W, 3-0
XXX L, 3-2
W, 5-4
W, 6-3

Union
L, 5-0
W, 3-2
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-2

T, 3-3





L, 2-1

W, 2-1

W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 5-4
XXX W, 2-0
W, 5-0
Yale
L, 3-2
W, 5-1
W, 4-1

W, 2-1

W, 6-2

W, 4-3

W, 6-1





L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 6-3

L, 2-0
L, 5-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.