2018-19 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
1 Quinnipiac 30 22 14-6-2 0.682 77 47 38 26-10-2 0.711 133 73 5-4-1 Lost 1
2 Cornell 30 22 13-5-4 0.682 64 41 36 21-11-4 0.639 108 73 6-3-1 Lost 1
3 Clarkson 28 22 13-7-2 0.636 65 42 39 26-11-2 0.692 122 78 7-1-2 Lost 1
4 Harvard 28 22 13-7-2 0.636 77 58 33 19-11-3 0.621 106 83 6-4 Lost 2
5 Dartmouth 23 22 10-9-3 0.523 53 55 34 13-17-4 0.441 87 93 4-5-1 Lost 2
6 Yale 23 22 11-10-1 0.523 53 57 33 15-15-3 0.500 85 88 4-6 Lost 2
7 Union 22 22 10-10-2 0.500 60 64 39 20-13-6 0.590 112 102 6-4 Lost 2
8 Brown 21 22 8-9-5 0.477 52 59 34 15-14-5 0.515 89 97 5-4-1 Lost 1
9 Princeton 18 22 8-12-2 0.409 60 66 31 10-18-3 0.371 83 96 4-5-1 Lost 2
10 Colgate 17 22 7-12-3 0.386 43 64 36 10-23-3 0.319 55 111 3-6-1 Lost 4
11 Rensselaer 16 22 7-13-2 0.364 49 67 36 10-23-3 0.319 69 111 2-6-2 Lost 5
12 St. Lawrence 8 22 3-17-2 0.182 51 84 37 6-29-2 0.189 75 149 2-7-1 Lost 1
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 5-1
W, 4-0
T, 2-2
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
T, 3-3
L, 4-2
L, 2-0
W, 5-2
W, 4-2
L, 4-2
W, 5-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-3
Clarkson
L, 5-1
L, 4-0
XXX L, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 5-0
T, 2-2
L, 2-0
W, 1-0
W, 4-3
L, 5-3
L, 3-1
T, 1-1
W, 4-2
L, 5-3
L, 6-0
L, 5-2
W, 4-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-2
L, 5-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
Colgate
T, 2-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
XXX W, 3-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 1-0
W, 6-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-3
W, 5-0
L, 5-4
W, 3-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 5-2
W, 6-0
L, 5-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-0
Cornell
L, 3-2
T, 3-3
L, 5-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
XXX W, 3-2
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
T, 1-1
W, 3-2
L, 3-1
L, 4-2
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
L, 4-2
W, 5-2
Dartmouth
W, 4-2
W, 2-0
W, 2-0
L, 1-0
T, 2-2
L, 1-0
L, 3-2
W, 5-1
XXX L, 7-6
W, 4-1
W, 7-1
L, 5-0
L, 5-1
W, 5-1
T, 3-3
L, 5-2
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-3
L, 3-0
L, 2-0
Harvard
L, 5-2
L, 4-2
L, 4-3
W, 5-3
L, 6-1
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 7-6
L, 4-1
XXX T, 4-4
W, 4-2
W, 5-3
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 7-3
L, 3-2
L, 5-3
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
L, 3-0
Princeton
W, 4-2
L, 5-1
W, 3-1
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-1
W, 3-2
L, 7-1
W, 5-0
T, 4-4
L, 4-2
XXX W, 3-0
W, 6-3
L, 4-1
W, 6-2
W, 3-2
L, 5-3
L, 4-3
W, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
Quinnipiac
W, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-2
W, 5-3
L, 5-0
W, 5-4
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 5-1
L, 5-1
L, 5-3
W, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 6-3
XXX L, 3-0
L, 2-1
L, 7-2
L, 7-2
W, 5-1
T, 1-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
Rensselaer
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 6-0
W, 5-2
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
T, 3-3
W, 5-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
L, 6-2
W, 3-0
W, 2-1
XXX L, 3-2
L, 6-5
L, 5-3
L, 4-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
St. Lawrence
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
L, 4-2
W, 3-0
W, 3-2
L, 5-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-2
W, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 7-3
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 5-3
W, 7-2
W, 7-2
W, 3-2
W, 6-5
XXX W, 4-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-3
W, 3-2
Union
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 5-1
L, 6-0
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
W, 5-3
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
L, 3-2
L, 5-1
T, 1-1
W, 5-3
W, 4-2
L, 4-1
L, 4-3
XXX W, 3-0
L, 4-3
Yale
L, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
L, 4-2
L, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 5-2
W, 3-0
W, 2-0
T, 3-3
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 5-3
L, 3-2
L, 3-0
W, 4-3
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.