2017-18 Standings Presented by U.S. Army ROTC

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
1. Cornell 36 22 17-3-2 0.818 61 32 33 25-6-2 0.788 102 52 6-3-1 Lost 2
2. Union 33 22 16-5-1 0.750 70 48 38 21-15-2 0.579 115 98 6-3-1 Lost 2
3. Clarkson 29 22 12-5-5 0.659 74 49 40 23-11-6 0.650 122 75 4-5-1 Lost 2
4. Harvard 25 22 11-8-3 0.568 68 50 33 15-14-4 0.515 104 85 5-5 Lost 1
5 (t). Dartmouth 23 22 11-10-1 0.523 55 69 35 16-17-2 0.486 83 107 6-4 Lost 2
5 (t). Colgate 23 22 10-9-3 0.523 49 46 40 17-17-6 0.500 87 88 5-4-1 Lost 2
7. Princeton 22 22 10-10-2 0.500 77 79 36 19-13-4 0.583 131 110 7-2-1 Lost 1
8. Yale 21 22 10-11-1 0.477 67 59 31 15-15-1 0.500 87 88 6-4 Lost 2
9. Quinnipiac 20 22 9-11-2 0.455 59 56 38 16-18-4 0.474 105 106 5-5 Lost 2
10. Brown 15 22 7-14-1 0.341 45 63 31 8-19-4 0.323 67 104 2-7-1 Lost 2
11. Rensselaer 10 22 4-16-2 0.227 45 86 37 6-27-4 0.216 73 129 2-8 Lost 1
12. St. Lawrence 7 22 3-18-1 0.159 43 76 37 8-27-2 0.243 80 122 2-8 Lost 1
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 5-3
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-3
L, 3-0
W, 3-0
L, 6-4
L, 3-0
W, 7-2
W, 5-0
W, 3-0
L, 5-4
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 2-0
L, 4-1
W, 5-2
Clarkson
L, 5-3
T, 2-2
XXX L, 5-2
T, 4-4
L, 4-0
T, 0-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
T, 6-6
W, 5-2
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
W, 4-1
L, 4-2
L, 6-0
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
Colgate
L, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
T, 4-4
XXX W, 2-0
W, 2-0
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
T, 0-0
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
L, 3-0
L, 5-2
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 3-1
T, 1-1
W, 5-1
W, 4-3
Cornell
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-0
T, 0-0
L, 2-0
L, 2-0
XXX L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 5-4
L, 7-1
L, 2-1
L, 1-0
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 6-1
L, 1-0
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
Dartmouth
L, 4-3
W, 3-0
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 3-1
XXX W, 5-0
W, 4-1
W, 9-2
W, 6-3
T, 0-0
L, 4-3
L, 6-5
L, 7-3
L, 3-2
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 6-4
Harvard
L, 3-0
W, 6-4
T, 6-6
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
L, 5-0
L, 4-1
XXX L, 5-2
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 4-3
L, 5-0
L, 4-3
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
Princeton
W, 3-0
L, 7-2
L, 4-3
T, 3-3
T, 0-0
W, 4-0
W, 5-4
W, 7-1
L, 9-2
L, 6-3
W, 5-2
W, 3-1
XXX W, 6-2
L, 5-3
L, 6-2
L, 7-2
L, 5-4
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
W, 4-1
L, 5-4
W, 7-2
Quinnipiac
L, 5-0
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 4-1
L, 4-3
W, 2-1
W, 1-0
T, 0-0
W, 4-3
W, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
W, 5-3
XXX W, 5-3
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 5-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-2
Rensselaer
W, 5-4
W, 2-1
W, 6-0
W, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
W, 6-5
W, 7-3
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 6-2
W, 7-2
L, 5-3
W, 4-1
XXX T, 4-4
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 5-1
St. Lawrence
W, 3-1
L, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
W, 6-1
W, 1-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-0
W, 5-4
W, 4-3
W, 5-2
W, 3-2
T, 4-4
W, 2-1
XXX W, 3-1
W, 5-4
W, 6-1
L, 1-0
Union
L, 3-1
L, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 3-1
T, 1-1
W, 4-3
L, 4-3
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-4
XXX W, 5-3
L, 3-2
Yale
W, 4-1
L, 5-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 4-3
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 6-4
L, 5-2
L, 2-1
W, 5-4
L, 7-2
W, 3-0
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 5-1
L, 6-1
W, 1-0
L, 5-3
W, 3-2
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.