2015-16 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
Quinnipiac 37 22 16-1-5 0.841 84 44 43 32-4-7 0.826 163 85 8-2 Lost 1
Yale 31 22 14-5-3 0.705 57 37 32 19-9-4 0.656 86 57 6-4 Lost 4
Harvard 28 22 12-6-4 0.636 72 47 34 19-11-4 0.618 116 81 6-3-1 Lost 2
St. Lawrence 25 22 11-8-3 0.568 68 50 37 19-14-4 0.568 107 84 5-3-2 Lost 1
Clarkson 23 22 10-9-3 0.523 52 51 38 20-15-3 0.566 101 95 5-5 Lost 2
Rensselaer 23 22 8-7-7 0.523 47 49 40 18-15-7 0.537 97 104 4-5-1 Lost 2
Dartmouth 22 22 11-11 0.500 60 69 35 18-16-1 0.529 94 104 5-5 Lost 1
Cornell 22 22 8-8-6 0.500 46 50 34 16-11-7 0.574 79 82 4-4-2 Lost 1
Union 18 22 6-10-6 0.409 53 62 36 13-14-9 0.486 91 96 3-5-2 Lost 3
Colgate 14 22 6-14-2 0.318 45 71 37 11-24-2 0.324 95 132 4-6 Lost 1
Brown 12 22 3-13-6 0.273 47 70 31 5-19-7 0.274 75 107 1-6-3 Lost 2
Princeton 9 22 3-16-3 0.205 40 71 31 5-23-3 0.210 60 99 0-9-1 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 5-0
L, 5-2
T, 1-1
L, 5-0
W, 1-0
T, 3-3
W, 7-3
W, 6-3
W, 5-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 4-3
W, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
Clarkson
L, 5-0
W, 5-2
XXX W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 4-3
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-0
L, 5-2
T, 1-1
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-2
W, 3-0
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
Colgate
T, 1-1
W, 5-0
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
XXX W, 5-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 5-2
W, 4-2
W, 7-4
L, 2-1
L, 5-4
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
T, 2-2
L, 2-0
W, 6-3
W, 4-2
L, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-0
Cornell
L, 1-0
T, 3-3
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
XXX W, 3-0
L, 1-0
W, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-3
L, 1-0
W, 5-4
T, 2-2
W, 1-0
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 5-1
T, 0-0
W, 4-2
Dartmouth
L, 7-3
L, 6-3
L, 5-2
W, 4-3
L, 3-2
L, 5-2
L, 3-0
W, 1-0
XXX W, 7-0
W, 5-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-0
W, 6-2
W, 7-5
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 5-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 5-1
Harvard
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 7-4
L, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 7-0
L, 5-2
XXX L, 3-0
L, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 5-4
T, 0-0
W, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
T, 4-4
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
Princeton
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
W, 5-4
W, 4-3
W, 1-0
W, 3-2
W, 2-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
XXX W, 6-0
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 4-1
T, 4-4
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 6-0
Quinnipiac
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 6-3
L, 5-4
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
L, 7-5
L, 4-1
L, 5-4
L, 6-0
L, 4-3
XXX T, 2-2
L, 5-4
T, 0-0
W, 4-3
L, 5-0
T, 3-3
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
Rensselaer
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 2-0
L, 1-0
T, 3-3
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
T, 0-0
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 5-4
XXX L, 4-3
W, 3-0
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-0
St. Lawrence
L, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-1
L, 6-3
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
L, 5-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 4-1
T, 0-0
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
L, 3-0
XXX L, 6-3
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
W, 4-3
Union
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 5-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
T, 4-4
W, 4-1
T, 4-4
L, 2-1
W, 5-0
T, 3-3
W, 5-1
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
T, 3-3
XXX W, 2-1
L, 2-1
Yale
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
T, 0-0
L, 4-2
L, 4-2
L, 5-1
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
L, 6-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.