2016-17 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS W-L-T PCT GP GF GA W-L-T PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
Quinnipiac 37 16-1-5 0.841 22 84 44 32-4-7 0.826 43 163 85 8-2 Lost 1
Yale 31 14-5-3 0.705 22 57 37 19-9-4 0.656 32 86 57 6-4 Lost 4
Harvard 28 12-6-4 0.636 22 72 47 19-11-4 0.618 34 116 81 6-3-1 Lost 2
St. Lawrence 25 11-8-3 0.568 22 68 50 19-14-4 0.568 37 107 84 5-3-2 Lost 1
Clarkson 23 10-9-3 0.523 22 52 51 20-15-3 0.566 38 101 95 5-5 Lost 2
Rensselaer 23 8-7-7 0.523 22 47 49 18-15-7 0.537 40 97 104 4-5-1 Lost 2
Dartmouth 22 11-11 0.500 22 60 69 18-16-1 0.529 35 94 104 5-5 Lost 1
Cornell 22 8-8-6 0.500 22 46 50 16-11-7 0.574 34 79 82 4-4-2 Lost 1
Union 18 6-10-6 0.409 22 53 62 13-14-9 0.486 36 91 96 3-5-2 Lost 3
Colgate 14 6-14-2 0.318 22 45 71 11-24-2 0.324 37 95 132 4-6 Lost 1
Brown 12 3-13-6 0.273 22 47 70 5-19-7 0.274 31 75 107 1-6-3 Lost 2
Princeton 9 3-16-3 0.205 22 40 71 5-23-3 0.210 31 60 99 0-9-1 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 5-0
L, 5-2
T, 1-1
L, 5-0
W, 1-0
T, 3-3
W, 7-3
W, 6-3
W, 5-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 4-3
W, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
Clarkson
L, 5-0
W, 5-2
XXX W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
W, 5-2
L, 4-3
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-0
L, 5-2
T, 1-1
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-2
W, 3-0
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
Colgate
T, 1-1
W, 5-0
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
XXX W, 5-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 5-2
W, 4-2
W, 7-4
L, 2-1
L, 5-4
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
T, 2-2
L, 2-0
W, 6-3
W, 4-2
L, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 3-0
Cornell
L, 1-0
T, 3-3
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
XXX W, 3-0
L, 1-0
W, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-3
L, 1-0
W, 5-4
T, 2-2
W, 1-0
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 5-1
T, 0-0
W, 4-2
Dartmouth
L, 7-3
L, 6-3
L, 5-2
W, 4-3
L, 3-2
L, 5-2
L, 3-0
W, 1-0
XXX W, 7-0
W, 5-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-0
W, 6-2
W, 7-5
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 5-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 5-1
Harvard
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 7-4
L, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 7-0
L, 5-2
XXX L, 3-0
L, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 5-4
T, 0-0
W, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
T, 4-4
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
Princeton
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
W, 5-4
W, 4-3
W, 1-0
W, 3-2
W, 2-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
XXX W, 6-0
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 4-1
T, 4-4
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 6-0
Quinnipiac
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 6-3
L, 5-4
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
L, 7-5
L, 4-1
L, 5-4
L, 6-0
L, 4-3
XXX T, 2-2
L, 5-4
T, 0-0
W, 4-3
L, 5-0
T, 3-3
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
Rensselaer
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 2-0
L, 1-0
T, 3-3
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
T, 0-0
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 5-4
XXX L, 4-3
W, 3-0
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-0
St. Lawrence
L, 6-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-1
L, 6-3
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
L, 5-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 4-1
T, 0-0
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
L, 3-0
XXX L, 6-3
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
W, 4-3
Union
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 5-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
T, 4-4
W, 4-1
T, 4-4
L, 2-1
W, 5-0
T, 3-3
W, 5-1
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
T, 3-3
XXX W, 2-1
L, 2-1
Yale
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
T, 0-0
L, 4-2
L, 4-2
L, 5-1
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
L, 6-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.