2014-15 Standings

		Conference					-	Overall
-	LEAGUE PTS	GP	W-L-T	PCT	GF	GA		GP	W-L-T	PCT	GF	GA	L10	STRK
1. Quinnipiac	35	22	16-3-3	0.795	60	37		39	23-12-4	0.641	106	89	4-4-2	Lost 2
2. St. Lawrence	29	22	14-7-1	0.659	70	41		37	20-14-3	0.581	113	75	5-4-1	Lost 1
3. Yale	28	22	12-6-4	0.636	60	37		33	18-10-5	0.621	86	54	5-3-2	Lost 2
4 (t). Dartmouth	26	22	12-8-2	0.591	64	55		33	17-12-4	0.576	91	78	6-4	Lost 2
4 (t). Colgate	26	22	11-7-4	0.591	53	51		38	22-12-4	0.632	102	82	7-2-1	Lost 1
6. Harvard	25	22	11-8-3	0.568	71	54		37	21-13-3	0.608	121	92	7-3	Lost 1
7. Cornell	22	22	9-9-4	0.500	45	46		29	12-13-4	0.483	59	66	2-5-3	Lost 3
8. Clarkson	19	22	8-11-3	0.432	49	47		37	12-20-5	0.392	81	87	2-7-1	Lost 1
9. Rensselaer	18	22	8-12-2	0.409	53	66		41	12-26-3	0.329	77	131	3-5-2	Lost 2
10. Union	17	22	8-13-1	0.386	58	63		39	19-18-2	0.513	122	104	5-5	Lost 1
11. Brown	13	22	5-14-3	0.295	44	80		31	8-20-3	0.306	65	112	4-4-2	Lost 3
12. Princeton	6	22	2-18-2	0.136	25	75		30	4-23-3	0.183	39	99	1-8-1	Lost 6

* Tournament Champion

x - Clinched Playoff Berth

# - Indicates Tournament Seed

e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats

	BRN	CLK	COL	COR	DAR	HAR	PRI	QUI	RPI	STL	UNI	YAL
Brown	XXX	W, 2-1 W, 6-0	W, 4-3 W, 4-2	W, 4-0 T, 3-3	W, 6-0 W, 6-3	W, 6-2 L, 2-1	T, 2-2 L, 4-1	W, 5-3 T, 2-2	L, 4-2 L, 6-3	W, 5-2 W, 5-2	W, 7-1 L, 1-0	W, 1-0 W, 5-1
Clarkson	L, 2-1 L, 6-0	XXX	T, 2-2 W, 2-1	W, 2-1 W, 2-0	L, 5-2 W, 3-2	W, 6-3 W, 3-2	L, 4-0 W, 2-1	L, 2-1 W, 4-1	L, 5-2 T, 3-3	L, 2-1 W, 2-1	W, 4-1 W, 3-2	T, 2-2 L, 1-0
Colgate	L, 4-3 L, 4-2	T, 2-2 L, 2-1	XXX	W, 2-1 T, 2-2	T, 2-2 L, 3-0	W, 6-1 W, 4-1	L, 5-1 L, 2-0	W, 5-0 W, 4-2	W, 4-1 L, 4-2	L, 5-2 L, 2-0	L, 5-4 L, 2-0	W, 3-1 T, 2-2
Cornell	L, 4-0 T, 3-3	L, 2-1 L, 2-0	L, 2-1 T, 2-2	XXX	W, 5-2 W, 3-2	L, 3-2 T, 3-3	W, 2-1 L, 4-2	W, 1-0 W, 1-0	W, 3-0 T, 2-2	W, 4-2 W, 3-1	L, 5-1 L, 2-1	L, 3-2 W, 4-0
Dartmouth	L, 6-0 L, 6-3	W, 5-2 L, 3-2	T, 2-2 W, 3-0	L, 5-2 L, 3-2	XXX	T, 3-3 W, 2-0	L, 4-2 L, 3-1	W, 2-1 L, 3-1	W, 2-1 L, 3-1	W, 3-2 W, 6-3	L, 4-3 L, 3-2	W, 4-1 L, 6-4
Harvard	L, 6-2 W, 2-1	L, 6-3 L, 3-2	L, 6-1 L, 4-1	W, 3-2 T, 3-3	T, 3-3 L, 2-0	XXX	L, 4-3 L, 5-0	L, 5-2 W, 5-2	L, 4-0 L, 6-2	W, 5-1 W, 5-1	T, 2-2 W, 5-4	W, 2-1 W, 3-0
Princeton	T, 2-2 W, 4-1	W, 4-0 L, 2-1	W, 5-1 W, 2-0	L, 2-1 W, 4-2	W, 4-2 W, 3-1	W, 4-3 W, 5-0	XXX	W, 2-0 W, 1-0	W, 3-1 W, 5-2	W, 3-0 T, 1-1	W, 6-1 W, 5-2	W, 4-0 W, 6-2
Quinnipiac	L, 5-3 T, 2-2	W, 2-1 L, 4-1	L, 5-0 L, 4-2	L, 1-0 L, 1-0	L, 2-1 W, 3-1	W, 5-2 L, 5-2	L, 2-0 L, 1-0	XXX	L, 3-1 L, 4-2	L, 3-2 L, 2-1	L, 4-3 L, 4-3	T, 2-2 T, 2-2
Rensselaer	W, 4-2 W, 6-3	W, 5-2 T, 3-3	L, 4-1 W, 4-2	L, 3-0 T, 2-2	L, 2-1 W, 3-1	W, 4-0 W, 6-2	L, 3-1 L, 5-2	W, 3-1 W, 4-2	XXX	W, 3-1 L, 4-3	L, 6-1 L, 2-1	W, 5-2 W, 4-1
St. Lawrence	L, 5-2 L, 5-2	W, 2-1 L, 2-1	W, 5-2 W, 2-0	L, 4-2 L, 3-1	L, 3-2 L, 6-3	L, 5-1 L, 5-1	L, 3-0 T, 1-1	W, 3-2 W, 2-1	L, 3-1 W, 4-3	XXX	L, 7-1 W, 3-2	L, 4-0 L, 3-2
Union	L, 7-1 W, 1-0	L, 4-1 L, 3-2	W, 5-4 W, 2-0	W, 5-1 W, 2-1	W, 4-3 W, 3-2	T, 2-2 L, 5-4	L, 6-1 L, 5-2	W, 4-3 W, 4-3	W, 6-1 W, 2-1	W, 7-1 L, 3-2	XXX	L, 3-1 W, 2-0
Yale	L, 1-0 L, 5-1	T, 2-2 W, 1-0	L, 3-1 T, 2-2	W, 3-2 L, 4-0	L, 4-1 W, 6-4	L, 2-1 L, 3-0	L, 4-0 L, 6-2	T, 2-2 T, 2-2	L, 5-2 L, 4-1	W, 4-0 W, 3-2	W, 3-1 L, 2-0	XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
Wins.
Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.