2014-15 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS W-L-T PCT GP GF GA W-L-T PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
Quinnipiac 35 16-3-3 0.795 22 60 37 23-12-4 0.641 39 106 89 4-4-2 Lost 2
St. Lawrence 29 14-7-1 0.659 22 70 41 20-14-3 0.581 37 113 75 5-4-1 Lost 1
Yale 28 12-6-4 0.636 22 60 37 18-10-5 0.621 33 86 54 5-3-2 Lost 2
Dartmouth 26 12-8-2 0.591 22 64 55 17-12-4 0.576 33 91 78 6-4 Lost 2
Colgate 26 11-7-4 0.591 22 53 51 22-12-4 0.632 38 102 82 7-2-1 Lost 1
Harvard 25 11-8-3 0.568 22 71 54 21-13-3 0.608 37 121 92 7-3 Lost 1
Cornell 22 9-9-4 0.500 22 45 46 12-13-4 0.483 29 59 66 2-5-3 Lost 3
Clarkson 19 8-11-3 0.432 22 49 47 12-20-5 0.392 37 81 87 2-7-1 Lost 1
Rensselaer 18 8-12-2 0.409 22 53 66 12-26-3 0.329 41 77 131 3-5-2 Lost 2
Union 17 8-13-1 0.386 22 58 63 19-18-2 0.513 39 122 104 5-5 Lost 1
Brown 13 5-14-3 0.295 22 44 80 8-20-3 0.306 31 65 112 4-4-2 Lost 3
Princeton 6 2-18-2 0.136 22 25 75 4-23-3 0.183 30 39 99 1-8-1 Lost 6
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 2-1
W, 6-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
W, 4-0
T, 3-3
W, 6-0
W, 6-3
W, 6-2
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
W, 5-3
T, 2-2
L, 4-2
L, 6-3
W, 5-2
W, 5-2
W, 7-1
L, 1-0
W, 1-0
W, 5-1
Clarkson
L, 2-1
L, 6-0
XXX T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
L, 5-2
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
L, 5-2
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 1-0
Colgate
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
XXX W, 2-1
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 6-1
W, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
W, 5-0
W, 4-2
W, 4-1
L, 4-2
L, 5-2
L, 2-0
L, 5-4
L, 2-0
W, 3-1
T, 2-2
Cornell
L, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
XXX W, 5-2
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 1-0
W, 1-0
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 4-0
Dartmouth
L, 6-0
L, 6-3
W, 5-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
XXX T, 3-3
W, 2-0
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 6-4
Harvard
L, 6-2
W, 2-1
L, 6-3
L, 3-2
L, 6-1
L, 4-1
W, 3-2
T, 3-3
T, 3-3
L, 2-0
XXX L, 4-3
L, 5-0
L, 5-2
W, 5-2
L, 4-0
L, 6-2
W, 5-1
W, 5-1
T, 2-2
W, 5-4
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
Princeton
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-0
L, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-0
XXX W, 2-0
W, 1-0
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 3-0
T, 1-1
W, 6-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-0
W, 6-2
Quinnipiac
L, 5-3
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-0
L, 4-2
L, 1-0
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
L, 5-2
L, 2-0
L, 1-0
XXX L, 3-1
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-3
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
Rensselaer
W, 4-2
W, 6-3
W, 5-2
T, 3-3
L, 4-1
W, 4-2
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 4-0
W, 6-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-2
XXX W, 3-1
L, 4-3
L, 6-1
L, 2-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-1
St. Lawrence
L, 5-2
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 5-2
W, 2-0
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
L, 3-2
L, 6-3
L, 5-1
L, 5-1
L, 3-0
T, 1-1
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-3
XXX L, 7-1
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
Union
L, 7-1
W, 1-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 5-4
W, 2-0
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 5-4
L, 6-1
L, 5-2
W, 4-3
W, 4-3
W, 6-1
W, 2-1
W, 7-1
L, 3-2
XXX L, 3-1
W, 2-0
Yale
L, 1-0
L, 5-1
T, 2-2
W, 1-0
L, 3-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
W, 6-4
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
L, 6-2
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
L, 5-2
L, 4-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 2-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.