2014-15 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
1. Quinnipiac 35 22 16-3-3 0.795 60 37 39 23-12-4 0.641 106 89 4-4-2 Lost 2
2. St. Lawrence 29 22 14-7-1 0.659 70 41 37 20-14-3 0.581 113 75 5-4-1 Lost 1
3. Yale 28 22 12-6-4 0.636 60 37 33 18-10-5 0.621 86 54 5-3-2 Lost 2
4 (t). Dartmouth 26 22 12-8-2 0.591 64 55 33 17-12-4 0.576 91 78 6-4 Lost 2
4 (t). Colgate 26 22 11-7-4 0.591 53 51 38 22-12-4 0.632 102 82 7-2-1 Lost 1
6. Harvard 25 22 11-8-3 0.568 71 54 37 21-13-3 0.608 121 92 7-3 Lost 1
7. Cornell 22 22 9-9-4 0.500 45 46 29 12-13-4 0.483 59 66 2-5-3 Lost 3
8. Clarkson 19 22 8-11-3 0.432 49 47 37 12-20-5 0.392 81 87 2-7-1 Lost 1
9. Rensselaer 18 22 8-12-2 0.409 53 66 41 12-26-3 0.329 77 131 3-5-2 Lost 2
10. Union 17 22 8-13-1 0.386 58 63 39 19-18-2 0.513 122 104 5-5 Lost 1
11. Brown 13 22 5-14-3 0.295 44 80 31 8-20-3 0.306 65 112 4-4-2 Lost 3
12. Princeton 6 22 2-18-2 0.136 25 75 30 4-23-3 0.183 39 99 1-8-1 Lost 6
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 2-1
W, 6-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
W, 4-0
T, 3-3
W, 6-0
W, 6-3
W, 6-2
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
W, 5-3
T, 2-2
L, 4-2
L, 6-3
W, 5-2
W, 5-2
W, 7-1
L, 1-0
W, 1-0
W, 5-1
Clarkson
L, 2-1
L, 6-0
XXX T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
L, 5-2
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
L, 5-2
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 1-0
Colgate
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
XXX W, 2-1
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 6-1
W, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
W, 5-0
W, 4-2
W, 4-1
L, 4-2
L, 5-2
L, 2-0
L, 5-4
L, 2-0
W, 3-1
T, 2-2
Cornell
L, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
XXX W, 5-2
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 1-0
W, 1-0
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 4-0
Dartmouth
L, 6-0
L, 6-3
W, 5-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
XXX T, 3-3
W, 2-0
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 6-3
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 6-4
Harvard
L, 6-2
W, 2-1
L, 6-3
L, 3-2
L, 6-1
L, 4-1
W, 3-2
T, 3-3
T, 3-3
L, 2-0
XXX L, 4-3
L, 5-0
L, 5-2
W, 5-2
L, 4-0
L, 6-2
W, 5-1
W, 5-1
T, 2-2
W, 5-4
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
Princeton
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-0
L, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
L, 2-1
W, 4-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-0
XXX W, 2-0
W, 1-0
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 3-0
T, 1-1
W, 6-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-0
W, 6-2
Quinnipiac
L, 5-3
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-0
L, 4-2
L, 1-0
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 5-2
L, 5-2
L, 2-0
L, 1-0
XXX L, 3-1
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-3
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
Rensselaer
W, 4-2
W, 6-3
W, 5-2
T, 3-3
L, 4-1
W, 4-2
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 4-0
W, 6-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-2
XXX W, 3-1
L, 4-3
L, 6-1
L, 2-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-1
St. Lawrence
L, 5-2
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 5-2
W, 2-0
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
L, 3-2
L, 6-3
L, 5-1
L, 5-1
L, 3-0
T, 1-1
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-3
XXX L, 7-1
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
Union
L, 7-1
W, 1-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 5-4
W, 2-0
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 5-4
L, 6-1
L, 5-2
W, 4-3
W, 4-3
W, 6-1
W, 2-1
W, 7-1
L, 3-2
XXX L, 3-1
W, 2-0
Yale
L, 1-0
L, 5-1
T, 2-2
W, 1-0
L, 3-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
W, 6-4
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
L, 6-2
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
L, 5-2
L, 4-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 2-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.