2011-12 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
Union 32 22 14-4-4 0.727 76 38 41 26-8-7 0.720 143 75 8-2 Lost 1
Cornell 30 22 12-4-6 0.682 66 46 35 19-9-7 0.643 100 79 6-3-1 Lost 1
Harvard 25 22 8-5-9 0.568 61 59 34 13-10-11 0.544 106 100 6-3-1 Lost 1
Colgate 23 22 11-10-1 0.523 72 67 39 19-17-3 0.526 121 113 3-7 Lost 2
Quinnipiac 23 22 9-8-5 0.523 60 57 40 20-14-6 0.575 122 98 5-4-1 Lost 1
Yale 22 22 10-10-2 0.500 74 61 35 16-16-3 0.500 123 106 6-3-1 Lost 2
Clarkson 22 22 9-9-4 0.500 57 60 39 16-17-6 0.487 105 109 3-6-1 Lost 1
St. Lawrence 21 22 10-11-1 0.477 50 64 36 14-19-3 0.431 88 120 6-4 Lost 2
Dartmouth 19 22 8-11-3 0.432 63 74 33 13-16-4 0.455 93 102 4-6 Lost 2
Rensselaer 17 22 7-12-3 0.386 43 61 39 12-24-3 0.346 78 111 5-5 Lost 2
Princeton 16 22 6-12-4 0.364 58 72 32 9-16-7 0.391 85 105 2-6-2 Lost 1
Brown 14 22 5-13-4 0.318 54 75 32 9-18-5 0.359 75 97 1-7-2 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX T, 2-2
W, 3-1
W, 5-3
W, 7-6
L, 5-4
W, 5-2
W, 6-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
W, 3-0

L, 4-1
W, 5-3
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 5-3
L, 6-4
Clarkson
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
XXX W, 4-2
L, 2-1
T, 0-0
T, 1-1
L, 4-0
W, 6-4
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
L, 3-2
T, 1-1
W, 7-6
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
L, 5-3
L, 4-3
W, 3-1
W, 5-2

L, 5-4
W, 5-1
Colgate
L, 5-3
L, 7-6
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
XXX L, 2-1
L, 5-3
L, 4-0
W, 5-4
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
W, 6-2
L, 3-1
W, 7-1
L, 8-3
W, 4-2
L, 6-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 5-3
W, 2-0
L, 4-2
Cornell
W, 5-4
L, 5-2
T, 0-0
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-3
XXX L, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
L, 4-3
T, 4-4
L, 3-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-2
Dartmouth
L, 6-2
L, 4-1
W, 4-0
L, 6-4
W, 4-0
L, 5-4
W, 3-2
W, 4-3
XXX T, 3-3
T, 2-2
L, 5-3
T, 3-3
L, 5-4
W, 2-1
L, 4-3
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 7-1
W, 5-1
W, 5-4
W, 5-3
Harvard
L, 3-1
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
XXX W, 4-3
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
L, 6-3
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-3
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 2-0
L, 4-3
W, 7-1
Princeton
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 6-2
W, 4-0
T, 3-3
W, 5-3
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
XXX W, 5-2
W, 3-2
L, 5-3
L, 6-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-0
W, 6-2
W, 5-2
Quinnipiac
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
T, 1-1
L, 7-6
W, 3-1
L, 7-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
W, 5-4
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 6-3
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
XXX L, 3-2
L, 3-1
W, 1-0
W, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
Rensselaer
L, 1-0
L, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 8-3
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
W, 5-3
W, 6-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
XXX W, 2-0
L, 4-0
W, 5-1
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
L, 2-1
St. Lawrence

W, 4-1
L, 5-3
W, 5-3
W, 4-3
W, 6-2
L, 3-2
W, 1-0
W, 4-3
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
W, 4-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
L, 4-3
L, 2-0
W, 4-0
XXX W, 2-0
W, 6-0
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
Union
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-3
T, 4-4
W, 3-2
L, 7-1
L, 5-1
T, 3-3
L, 2-0
T, 3-3
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 5-2
L, 5-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
L, 6-0
XXX W, 4-0
L, 3-1
Yale
L, 5-3
W, 6-4

W, 5-4
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
W, 4-2
W, 6-2
W, 4-2
L, 5-4
L, 5-3
W, 4-3
L, 7-1
L, 6-2
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 2-0
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 4-3
L, 4-0
W, 3-1
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.