2010-11 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS GP W-L-T PCT GF GA GP W-L-T PCT GF GA L10 STRK
Union 36 22 17-3-2 0.818 75 43 40 26-10-4 0.700 144 84 6-3-1 Lost 3
Yale 35 22 17-4-1 0.795 84 46 36 28-7-1 0.792 151 74 7-2-1 Lost 1
Dartmouth 26 22 12-8-2 0.591 70 48 34 19-12-3 0.603 111 87 5-5 Won 1
Rensselaer 24 22 11-9-2 0.545 67 52 38 20-13-5 0.592 110 90 2-7-1 Lost 3
Princeton 24 22 11-9-2 0.545 69 70 32 17-13-2 0.563 105 88 3-6-1 Lost 2
Cornell 24 22 11-9-2 0.545 57 53 34 16-15-3 0.515 86 88 5-5 Lost 1
Quinnipiac 19 22 6-9-7 0.432 49 62 39 16-15-8 0.513 95 102 3-4-3 Lost 1
Clarkson 19 22 9-12-1 0.432 58 78 36 15-19-2 0.444 98 117 3-7 Lost 2
Brown 18 22 8-12-2 0.409 55 70 31 10-16-5 0.403 83 107 3-6-1 Lost 2
Harvard 15 22 7-14-1 0.341 49 61 34 12-21-1 0.368 77 98 7-3 Lost 2
St. Lawrence 13 22 6-15-1 0.295 53 73 40 13-22-5 0.388 101 124 4-6 Lost 2
Colgate 11 22 4-15-3 0.250 51 81 42 11-28-3 0.298 107 142 4-5-1 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 5-2
L, 6-4
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-0
L, 4-3

W, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 7-3
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
W, 6-2
W, 3-0
L, 2-1
L, 5-1
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
W, 5-2
L, 3-2
Clarkson
L, 3-1
L, 4-1
XXX T, 4-4
W, 4-2
W, 6-1
W, 5-2
W, 7-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-1
L, 5-3
W, 4-3
L, 5-3
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 5-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 8-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-2
W, 6-3
Colgate
W, 5-2
W, 6-4
T, 4-4
L, 4-2
XXX T, 1-1
W, 5-2
W, 7-3
L, 5-3
W, 6-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 5-4
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-0
W, 2-1
W, 6-3
W, 6-4
T, 1-1
Cornell
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 6-1
L, 5-2
T, 1-1
L, 5-2
XXX T, 2-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
W, 3-0
L, 4-3
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-2
W, 4-1
Dartmouth
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
L, 7-1
W, 4-1
L, 7-3
W, 5-3
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
XXX L, 8-2
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
W, 2-0
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
W, 5-1
L, 6-1
L, 4-2
T, 0-0
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-2
Harvard
W, 4-3

L, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-3
W, 8-2
W, 5-2
XXX W, 1-0
T, 4-4
W, 5-4
W, 3-1
L, 1-0
W, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 4-3
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-2
W, 1-0
Princeton
L, 4-3
L, 7-3
W, 5-3
L, 4-3
L, 4-3
L, 5-4
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 1-0
T, 4-4
XXX L, 3-0
T, 1-1
W, 5-2
L, 4-3
L, 5-1
L, 5-3
W, 7-4
W, 5-0
W, 5-3
W, 5-4
Quinnipiac
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-3
L, 3-2
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 2-0
W, 3-1
L, 5-4
L, 3-1
W, 3-0
T, 1-1
XXX T, 3-3
T, 2-2
W, 6-4
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 5-1
W, 6-1
Rensselaer
L, 6-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-2
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
W, 1-0
L, 3-2
L, 5-2
W, 4-3
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
XXX L, 5-3
W, 5-3
W, 2-1
L, 4-3
W, 4-2
L, 5-2
St. Lawrence
W, 2-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-0
W, 4-3
W, 6-1
W, 4-2
W, 4-2
W, 4-3
W, 5-1
W, 5-3
L, 6-4
T, 2-2
W, 5-3
L, 5-3
XXX W, 3-1
W, 5-2
W, 4-1
L, 3-2
Union
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
L, 8-1
L, 4-3
L, 2-1
L, 6-3
L, 5-1
L, 4-0
T, 0-0
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 7-4
L, 5-0
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
XXX W, 5-0
L, 3-2
Yale
L, 5-2
W, 3-2
L, 5-2
L, 6-3
L, 6-4
T, 1-1
L, 4-2
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 4-2
L, 1-0
L, 5-3
L, 5-4
L, 5-1
L, 6-1
L, 4-2
W, 5-2
L, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 5-0
W, 3-2
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.