2012-13 Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Cornell | 22 | 37 | 18-3-1 | 0.841 | 84 | 27 | 34 | 27-6-1 | 0.809 | 131 | 55 | 8-1-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 36 | 18-4-0 | 0.818 | 61 | 28 | 38 | 28-10-0 | 0.737 | 110 | 68 | 7-3 | Lost 2 | |
| Harvard | 22 | 36 | 17-3-2 | 0.818 | 77 | 25 | 34 | 24-7-3 | 0.750 | 113 | 41 | 6-3-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 29 | 13-6-3 | 0.659 | 66 | 41 | 36 | 20-12-4 | 0.611 | 103 | 75 | 5-3-2 | Lost 1 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 28 | 12-6-4 | 0.636 | 65 | 54 | 38 | 19-14-5 | 0.566 | 98 | 92 | 4-3-3 | Lost 1 | |
| Dartmouth | 22 | 26 | 11-7-4 | 0.591 | 58 | 49 | 31 | 16-10-5 | 0.597 | 84 | 71 | 4-4-2 | Lost 2 | |
| Rensselaer | 22 | 18 | 8-12-2 | 0.409 | 48 | 59 | 36 | 10-22-4 | 0.333 | 76 | 99 | 2-7-1 | Lost 5 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 15 | 6-13-3 | 0.341 | 40 | 70 | 35 | 11-21-3 | 0.357 | 66 | 122 | 4-6 | Lost 2 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 14 | 6-14-2 | 0.318 | 46 | 75 | 29 | 11-16-2 | 0.414 | 66 | 90 | 5-5 | Lost 1 | |
| Yale | 22 | 11 | 4-15-3 | 0.250 | 35 | 64 | 29 | 5-21-3 | 0.224 | 41 | 88 | 2-6-2 | Lost 1 | |
| Brown | 22 | 10 | 5-17-0 | 0.227 | 31 | 61 | 27 | 6-20-1 | 0.241 | 42 | 76 | 2-8 | Lost 3 | |
| Union | 22 | 4 | 0-18-4 | 0.091 | 15 | 73 | 34 | 7-23-4 | 0.265 | 41 | 105 | 0-9-1 | Lost 2 | |
Head to Head
Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
W, 2-1 W, 2-1 |
L, 4-1 W, 4-3 |
W, 2-0 W, 4-2 |
W, 1-0 W, 2-0 |
W, 3-0 W, 5-2 |
W, 6-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 5-0 W, 4-0 |
W, 3-0 L, 5-2 |
W, 4-1 W, 4-3 |
L, 1-0 L, 2-1 |
W, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
|
Clarkson |
L, 2-1 L, 2-1 |
XXX |
W, 2-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 2-1 W, 3-1 |
L, 5-0 L, 3-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-1 |
L, 4-1 L, 1-0 |
L, 6-2 L, 3-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 6-0 L, 3-2 |
L, 4-1 L, 1-0 |
|
Colgate |
W, 4-1 L, 4-3 |
L, 2-1 W, 3-1 |
XXX |
W, 9-0 W, 9-2 |
T, 2-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 4-1 W, 5-2 |
T, 3-3 L, 6-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 4-1 |
W, 4-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 4-3 T, 1-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 3-0 W, 2-0 |
|
Cornell |
L, 2-0 L, 4-2 |
W, 2-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 9-0 L, 9-2 |
XXX |
L, 2-1 T, 0-0 |
W, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 4-0 L, 4-1 |
L, 4-3 W, 4-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 4-1 |
L, 4-2 L, 6-0 |
L, 8-1 L, 4-0 |
L, 3-2 L, 5-0 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 1-0 L, 2-0 |
W, 5-0 W, 3-1 |
T, 2-2 L, 3-2 |
W, 2-1 T, 0-0 |
XXX |
W, 6-0 T, 2-2 |
L, 3-1 L, 6-2 |
W, 8-3 L, 5-2 |
W, 2-1 T, 2-2 |
W, 2-1 L, 7-2 |
L, 6-0 L, 3-0 |
L, 5-4 L, 4-2 |
|
Harvard |
L, 3-0 L, 5-2 |
W, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
L, 4-1 L, 5-2 |
L, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
L, 6-0 T, 2-2 |
XXX |
L, 9-1 L, 3-0 |
L, 2-0 L, 4-0 |
L, 2-1 L, 4-1 |
L, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 9-0 L, 1-0 |
L, 4-0 L, 3-1 |
|
Princeton |
L, 6-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 6-1 |
W, 4-0 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-1 W, 6-2 |
W, 9-1 W, 3-0 |
XXX |
W, 3-2 W, 4-0 |
L, 6-5 W, 4-3 |
W, 6-2 W, 4-2 |
T, 1-1 L, 3-0 |
L, 3-1 W, 4-2 |
|
Quinnipiac |
L, 5-0 L, 4-0 |
W, 4-1 W, 1-0 |
L, 2-1 L, 4-1 |
W, 4-3 L, 4-1 |
L, 8-3 W, 5-2 |
W, 2-0 W, 4-0 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-0 |
XXX |
L, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
L, 6-4 T, 1-1 |
T, 2-2 L, 4-1 |
T, 2-2 L, 4-0 |
|
Rensselaer |
L, 3-0 W, 5-2 |
W, 6-2 W, 3-1 |
L, 4-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 3-1 W, 4-1 |
L, 2-1 T, 2-2 |
W, 2-1 W, 4-1 |
W, 6-5 L, 4-3 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
XXX |
W, 3-2 T, 1-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 2-0 |
L, 4-3 L, 4-2 |
|
St. Lawrence |
L, 4-1 L, 4-3 |
W, 3-1 L, 3-2 |
L, 4-3 T, 1-1 |
W, 4-2 W, 6-0 |
L, 2-1 W, 7-2 |
W, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 6-2 L, 4-2 |
W, 6-4 T, 1-1 |
L, 3-2 T, 1-1 |
XXX |
L, 6-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 5-1 L, 5-1 |
|
Union |
W, 1-0 W, 2-1 |
W, 6-0 W, 3-2 |
W, 3-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 8-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 6-0 W, 3-0 |
W, 9-0 W, 1-0 |
T, 1-1 W, 3-0 |
T, 2-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 2-0 |
W, 6-1 W, 3-1 |
XXX |
T, 1-1 T, 1-1 |
|
Yale |
L, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
W, 4-1 W, 1-0 |
L, 3-0 L, 2-0 |
W, 3-2 W, 5-0 |
W, 5-4 W, 4-2 |
W, 4-0 W, 3-1 |
W, 3-1 L, 4-2 |
T, 2-2 W, 4-0 |
W, 4-3 W, 4-2 |
W, 5-1 W, 5-1 |
T, 1-1 T, 1-1 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins.
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
