2012-13 Standings

  Conference Overall
GP Pts Record Win % GF GA GP Record Win % GF GA Last 10 Streak
22 37 18-3-1 0.841 84 27 34 27-6-1 0.809 131 55 8-1-1 Lost 1
22 36 18-4-0 0.818 61 28 38 28-10-0 0.737 110 68 7-3 Lost 2
22 36 17-3-2 0.818 77 25 34 24-7-3 0.750 113 41 6-3-1 Lost 2
22 29 13-6-3 0.659 66 41 36 20-12-4 0.611 103 75 5-3-2 Lost 1
22 28 12-6-4 0.636 65 54 38 19-14-5 0.566 98 92 4-3-3 Lost 1
22 26 11-7-4 0.591 58 49 31 16-10-5 0.597 84 71 4-4-2 Lost 2
22 18 8-12-2 0.409 48 59 36 10-22-4 0.333 76 99 2-7-1 Lost 5
22 15 6-13-3 0.341 40 70 35 11-21-3 0.357 66 122 4-6 Lost 2
22 14 6-14-2 0.318 46 75 29 11-16-2 0.414 66 90 5-5 Lost 1
22 11 4-15-3 0.250 35 64 29 5-21-3 0.224 41 88 2-6-2 Lost 1
22 10 5-17-0 0.227 31 61 27 6-20-1 0.241 42 76 2-8 Lost 3
22 4 0-18-4 0.091 15 73 34 7-23-4 0.265 41 105 0-9-1 Lost 2

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
W, 2-0
W, 4-2
W, 1-0
W, 2-0
W, 3-0
W, 5-2
W, 6-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-0
W, 4-0
W, 3-0
L, 5-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-3
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
Clarkson
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
XXX W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 5-0
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
L, 6-2
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-2
L, 6-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
Colgate
W, 4-1
L, 4-3
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
XXX W, 9-0
W, 9-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 5-2
T, 3-3
L, 6-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
T, 1-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 2-0
Cornell
L, 2-0
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 9-0
L, 9-2
XXX L, 2-1
T, 0-0
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
L, 4-3
W, 4-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-2
L, 6-0
L, 8-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 5-0
Dartmouth
L, 1-0
L, 2-0
W, 5-0
W, 3-1
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
T, 0-0
XXX W, 6-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
W, 8-3
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 7-2
L, 6-0
L, 3-0
L, 5-4
L, 4-2
Harvard
L, 3-0
L, 5-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-1
W, 3-1
L, 6-0
T, 2-2
XXX L, 9-1
L, 3-0
L, 2-0
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 9-0
L, 1-0
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
Princeton
L, 6-1
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 6-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 6-2
W, 9-1
W, 3-0
XXX W, 3-2
W, 4-0
L, 6-5
W, 4-3
W, 6-2
W, 4-2
T, 1-1
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
W, 4-2
Quinnipiac
L, 5-0
L, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
L, 4-1
L, 8-3
W, 5-2
W, 2-0
W, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-0
XXX L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 6-4
T, 1-1
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
L, 4-0
Rensselaer
L, 3-0
W, 5-2
W, 6-2
W, 3-1
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 6-5
L, 4-3
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
XXX W, 3-2
T, 1-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
St. Lawrence
L, 4-1
L, 4-3
W, 3-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-3
T, 1-1
W, 4-2
W, 6-0
L, 2-1
W, 7-2
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-2
W, 6-4
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
T, 1-1
XXX L, 6-1
L, 3-1
L, 5-1
L, 5-1
Union
W, 1-0
W, 2-1
W, 6-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 8-1
W, 4-0
W, 6-0
W, 3-0
W, 9-0
W, 1-0
T, 1-1
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 6-1
W, 3-1
XXX T, 1-1
T, 1-1
Yale
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
L, 3-0
L, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 5-0
W, 5-4
W, 4-2
W, 4-0
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
W, 5-1
W, 5-1
T, 1-1
T, 1-1
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.