2012-13 ECAC Women's Hockey Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS W-L PCT GP GF GA W-L PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
Cornell 37 18-3-1 0.841 22 84 27 27-6-1 0.809 34 131 55 8-1-1 Lost 1
Clarkson 36 18-4 0.818 22 61 28 28-10-0 0.737 38 110 68 7-3 Lost 2
Harvard 36 17-3-2 0.818 22 77 25 24-7-3 0.750 34 113 41 6-3-1 Lost 2
Quinnipiac 29 13-6-3 0.659 22 66 41 20-12-4 0.611 36 103 75 5-3-2 Lost 1
St. Lawrence 28 12-6-4 0.636 22 65 54 19-14-5 0.566 38 98 92 4-3-3 Lost 1
Dartmouth 26 11-7-4 0.591 22 58 49 16-10-5 0.597 31 84 71 4-4-2 Lost 2
Rensselaer 18 8-12-2 0.409 22 48 59 10-22-4 0.333 36 76 99 2-7-1 Lost 5
Colgate 15 6-13-3 0.341 22 40 70 11-21-3 0.357 35 66 122 4-6 Lost 2
Princeton 14 6-14-2 0.318 22 46 75 11-16-2 0.414 29 66 90 5-5 Lost 1
Yale 11 4-15-3 0.250 22 35 64 5-21-3 0.224 29 41 88 2-6-2 Lost 1
Brown 10 5-17 0.227 22 31 61 6-20-1 0.241 27 42 76 2-8 Lost 3
Union 4 0-18-4 0.091 22 15 73 7-23-4 0.265 34 41 105 0-9-1 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
W, 2-0
W, 4-2
W, 1-0
W, 2-0
W, 3-0
W, 5-2
W, 6-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-0
W, 4-0
W, 3-0
L, 5-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-3
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
Clarkson
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
XXX W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
L, 5-0
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
L, 6-2
L, 3-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-2
L, 6-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
Colgate
W, 4-1
L, 4-3
L, 2-1
W, 3-1
XXX W, 9-0
W, 9-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 5-2
T, 3-3
L, 6-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
T, 1-1
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 2-0
Cornell
L, 2-0
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 9-0
L, 9-2
XXX L, 2-1
T, 0-0
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
L, 4-3
W, 4-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-2
L, 6-0
L, 8-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 5-0
Dartmouth
L, 1-0
L, 2-0
W, 5-0
W, 3-1
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
T, 0-0
XXX W, 6-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
W, 8-3
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 7-2
L, 6-0
L, 3-0
L, 5-4
L, 4-2
Harvard
L, 3-0
L, 5-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-1
W, 3-1
L, 6-0
T, 2-2
XXX L, 9-1
L, 3-0
L, 2-0
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 9-0
L, 1-0
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
Princeton
L, 6-1
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 6-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
W, 6-2
W, 9-1
W, 3-0
XXX W, 3-2
W, 4-0
L, 6-5
W, 4-3
W, 6-2
W, 4-2
T, 1-1
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
W, 4-2
Quinnipiac
L, 5-0
L, 4-0
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
L, 4-1
L, 8-3
W, 5-2
W, 2-0
W, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 4-0
XXX L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 6-4
T, 1-1
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
L, 4-0
Rensselaer
L, 3-0
W, 5-2
W, 6-2
W, 3-1
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 6-5
L, 4-3
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
XXX W, 3-2
T, 1-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
St. Lawrence
L, 4-1
L, 4-3
W, 3-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-3
T, 1-1
W, 4-2
W, 6-0
L, 2-1
W, 7-2
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-2
W, 6-4
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
T, 1-1
XXX L, 6-1
L, 3-1
L, 5-1
L, 5-1
Union
W, 1-0
W, 2-1
W, 6-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 8-1
W, 4-0
W, 6-0
W, 3-0
W, 9-0
W, 1-0
T, 1-1
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 6-1
W, 3-1
XXX T, 1-1
T, 1-1
Yale
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
L, 3-0
L, 2-0
W, 3-2
W, 5-0
W, 5-4
W, 4-2
W, 4-0
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
W, 5-1
W, 5-1
T, 1-1
T, 1-1
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.