Scoreboard

 

2011-12 Standings

  Conference Overall
GP Pts Record Win % GF GA GP Record Win % GF GA Last 10 Streak
22 40 20-2-0 0.909 99 28 35 30-5-0 0.857 161 61 8-2 Lost 1
22 35 17-4-1 0.795 79 30 32 22-9-1 0.703 115 60 8-2 Lost 1
22 32 15-5-2 0.727 69 31 37 22-10-5 0.662 103 66 7-3 Lost 1
22 30 14-6-2 0.682 61 39 30 18-10-2 0.633 91 66 6-4 Lost 2
22 30 14-6-2 0.682 69 44 38 24-10-4 0.684 121 83 8-2 Lost 1
22 26 12-8-2 0.591 61 48 37 19-16-2 0.541 92 85 4-6 Lost 1
22 22 10-10-2 0.500 44 43 31 12-15-4 0.452 64 72 4-6 Lost 2
22 14 5-13-4 0.318 31 63 31 8-16-7 0.371 61 82 1-9 Lost 4
22 14 6-14-2 0.318 44 63 34 9-21-4 0.324 73 102 4-6 Lost 2
22 12 5-15-2 0.273 35 69 33 10-21-2 0.333 66 94 2-7-1 Lost 3
22 6 2-18-2 0.136 23 68 34 4-26-4 0.176 51 110 1-8-1 Lost 8
22 3 1-20-1 0.068 23 112 29 1-27-1 0.052 31 152 0-9-1 Lost 3

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 6-2
W, 4-3
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
W, 9-0
W, 5-0
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 5-1
W, 1-0
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 3-1
L, 1-0
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
Clarkson
L, 6-2
L, 4-3
XXX L, 4-1
L, 1-0
L, 5-3
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 1-0
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 10-0
W, 3-2
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
L, 6-2
L, 5-2
L, 7-0
Colgate
T, 1-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
XXX W, 6-2
W, 3-0
W, 2-0
W, 4-3
W, 2-0
W, 4-0
L, 6-4
W, 5-3
W, 6-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 6-0
W, 6-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
T, 1-1
Cornell
L, 9-0
L, 5-0
W, 5-3
L, 2-1
L, 6-2
L, 3-0
XXX W, 5-4
L, 1-0
L, 5-3
L, 2-0
L, 3-1
L, 1-0
L, 7-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-0
L, 3-0
L, 6-4
L, 3-2
L, 9-1
L, 5-1
L, 9-0
L, 6-1
Dartmouth
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 1-0
L, 2-0
L, 4-3
L, 5-4
W, 1-0
XXX L, 3-2
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 4-2
W, 4-2
L, 1-0
W, 2-0
L, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 6-0
L, 10-5
Harvard
L, 3-0
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
L, 4-0
W, 5-3
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
XXX W, 3-0
L, 10-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-2
L, 5-3
L, 4-2
L, 7-1
L, 6-1
L, 2-0
L, 1-0
L, 8-0
L, 4-0
Princeton
L, 1-0
L, 3-0
W, 1-0
W, 2-1
W, 6-4
L, 5-3
W, 3-1
W, 1-0
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
W, 10-1
XXX W, 1-0
W, 3-0
T, 1-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 7-1
L, 5-1
Quinnipiac
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 3-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-1
W, 7-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 4-2
L, 1-0
L, 3-0
XXX L, 2-0
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
W, 4-3
L, 5-1
L, 6-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
Rensselaer
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 10-0
L, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 4-2
W, 5-3
W, 4-2
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 5-1
XXX W, 2-1
W, 6-3
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
L, 5-0
L, 4-2
St. Lawrence
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 3-2
T, 1-1
L, 6-0
L, 6-0
W, 6-4
W, 3-2
W, 1-0
L, 2-0
W, 7-1
W, 6-1
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
W, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 2-1
L, 6-3
XXX T, 2-2
L, 3-1
L, 7-1
L, 6-2
Union
W, 1-0
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 6-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 9-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 2-0
W, 1-0
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 5-1
W, 6-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
XXX W, 3-2
L, 2-0
Yale
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 5-2
W, 7-0
W, 4-0
T, 1-1
W, 9-0
W, 6-1
W, 6-0
W, 10-5
W, 8-0
W, 4-0
W, 7-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-0
W, 3-2
W, 5-0
W, 4-2
W, 7-1
W, 6-2
L, 3-2
W, 2-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.