2011-12 ECAC Women's Hockey Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
PTS W-L PCT GP GF GA W-L PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
Cornell 40 20-2 0.909 22 99 28 30-5-0 0.857 35 161 61 8-2 Lost 1
Harvard 35 17-4-1 0.795 22 79 30 22-9-1 0.703 32 115 60 8-2 Lost 1
Clarkson 32 15-5-2 0.727 22 69 31 22-10-5 0.662 37 103 66 7-3 Lost 1
Dartmouth 30 14-6-2 0.682 22 61 39 18-10-2 0.633 30 91 66 6-4 Lost 2
St. Lawrence 30 14-6-2 0.682 22 69 44 24-10-4 0.684 38 121 83 8-2 Lost 1
Quinnipiac 26 12-8-2 0.591 22 61 48 19-16-2 0.541 37 92 85 4-6 Lost 1
Princeton 22 10-10-2 0.500 22 44 43 12-15-4 0.452 31 64 72 4-6 Lost 2
Brown 14 5-13-4 0.318 22 31 63 8-16-7 0.371 31 61 82 1-9 Lost 4
Rensselaer 14 6-14-2 0.318 22 44 63 9-21-4 0.324 34 73 102 4-6 Lost 2
Colgate 12 5-15-2 0.273 22 35 69 10-21-2 0.333 33 66 94 2-7-1 Lost 3
Union 6 2-18-2 0.136 22 23 68 4-26-4 0.176 34 51 110 1-8-1 Lost 8
Yale 3 1-20-1 0.068 22 23 112 1-27-1 0.052 29 31 152 0-9-1 Lost 3
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 6-2
W, 4-3
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
W, 9-0
W, 5-0
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 5-1
W, 1-0
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 3-1
L, 1-0
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
Clarkson
L, 6-2
L, 4-3
XXX L, 4-1
L, 1-0
L, 5-3
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 1-0
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 10-0
W, 3-2
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
L, 6-2
L, 5-2
L, 7-0
Colgate
T, 1-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
XXX W, 6-2
W, 3-0
W, 2-0
W, 4-3
W, 2-0
W, 4-0
L, 6-4
W, 5-3
W, 6-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 6-0
W, 6-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
T, 1-1
Cornell
L, 9-0
L, 5-0
W, 5-3
L, 2-1
L, 6-2
L, 3-0
XXX W, 5-4
L, 1-0
L, 5-3
L, 2-0
L, 3-1
L, 1-0
L, 7-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-0
L, 3-0
L, 6-4
L, 3-2
L, 9-1
L, 5-1
L, 9-0
L, 6-1
Dartmouth
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 1-0
L, 2-0
L, 4-3
L, 5-4
W, 1-0
XXX L, 3-2
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 4-2
W, 4-2
L, 1-0
W, 2-0
L, 3-2
L, 3-0
L, 6-0
L, 10-5
Harvard
L, 3-0
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
L, 4-0
W, 5-3
W, 2-0
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
XXX W, 3-0
L, 10-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-2
L, 5-3
L, 4-2
L, 7-1
L, 6-1
L, 2-0
L, 1-0
L, 8-0
L, 4-0
Princeton
L, 1-0
L, 3-0
W, 1-0
W, 2-1
W, 6-4
L, 5-3
W, 3-1
W, 1-0
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
W, 10-1
XXX W, 1-0
W, 3-0
T, 1-1
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 7-1
L, 5-1
Quinnipiac
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 3-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-1
W, 7-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 4-2
L, 1-0
L, 3-0
XXX L, 2-0
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
W, 4-3
L, 5-1
L, 6-2
L, 3-0
L, 3-2
Rensselaer
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 10-0
L, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 4-2
W, 5-3
W, 4-2
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 5-1
XXX W, 2-1
W, 6-3
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
L, 5-0
L, 4-2
St. Lawrence
L, 3-0
L, 3-1
L, 3-2
T, 1-1
L, 6-0
L, 6-0
W, 6-4
W, 3-2
W, 1-0
L, 2-0
W, 7-1
W, 6-1
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
W, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 2-1
L, 6-3
XXX T, 2-2
L, 3-1
L, 7-1
L, 6-2
Union
W, 1-0
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 6-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 9-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 2-0
W, 1-0
W, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 5-1
W, 6-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
XXX W, 3-2
L, 2-0
Yale
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 5-2
W, 7-0
W, 4-0
T, 1-1
W, 9-0
W, 6-1
W, 6-0
W, 10-5
W, 8-0
W, 4-0
W, 7-1
W, 5-1
W, 3-0
W, 3-2
W, 5-0
W, 4-2
W, 7-1
W, 6-2
L, 3-2
W, 2-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.