2010-11 ECAC Women's Hockey Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
PTS W-L PCT GP GF GA W-L PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
Cornell 41 20-1-1 0.932 22 99 20 31-3-1 0.900 35 157 39 8-2 Lost 1
Harvard 31 14-5-3 0.705 22 68 43 17-11-4 0.594 32 97 76 5-3-2 Lost 1
Dartmouth 30 15-7 0.682 22 74 51 22-12-0 0.647 34 112 81 7-3 Lost 2
Princeton 27 13-8-1 0.614 22 51 42 16-14-1 0.532 31 68 64 6-4 Lost 2
Quinnipiac 25 12-9-1 0.568 22 58 43 22-12-3 0.635 37 105 63 5-3-2 Lost 1
Clarkson 24 10-8-4 0.545 22 50 46 14-17-6 0.459 37 76 85 3-4-3 Lost 2
St. Lawrence 22 11-11 0.500 22 51 48 16-18-2 0.472 36 90 96 4-6 Lost 2
Rensselaer 18 8-12-2 0.409 22 43 55 10-18-7 0.386 35 63 97 1-8-1 Lost 6
Colgate 18 8-12-2 0.409 22 39 62 11-19-3 0.379 33 63 95 4-5-1 Lost 2
Yale 18 8-12-2 0.409 22 42 54 9-17-3 0.362 29 52 73 4-5-1 Lost 1
Brown 6 1-17-4 0.136 22 28 81 2-23-4 0.138 29 38 114 0-9-1 Tied 1
Union 4 1-19-2 0.091 22 18 76 2-29-3 0.103 34 33 109 1-9 Lost 4
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX T, 1-1
W, 5-3
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-0
W, 8-0
W, 4-2
W, 6-0
W, 4-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-0
W, 4-2
W, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 1-0
W, 4-2
W, 5-2
W, 4-2
T, 1-1
W, 3-2

W, 4-0
W, 4-2
Clarkson
T, 1-1
L, 5-3
XXX W, 5-2
T, 2-2
W, 3-0
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-0
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-0
L, 4-0
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
Colgate
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
L, 5-2
T, 2-2
XXX W, 6-1
W, 5-0
W, 6-2
W, 4-3
W, 3-1
W, 7-0
W, 2-0
L, 2-0
L, 2-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-4
L, 2-0
W, 5-3
W, 4-2
L, 1-0
L, 1-0
W, 3-1
L, 1-0
Cornell
L, 3-0
L, 8-0
L, 3-0
T, 3-3
L, 6-1
L, 5-0
XXX L, 6-1
W, 4-2
L, 3-0
L, 4-3
L, 5-1
L, 1-0
L, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 6-1
L, 6-0
L, 3-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 8-0
L, 5-0
L, 7-1
Dartmouth
L, 4-2
L, 6-0
W, 3-2
L, 3-1
L, 6-2
L, 4-3
W, 6-1
L, 4-2
XXX W, 5-3
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 7-0
L, 4-3
W, 4-0
W, 5-2
L, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 5-1
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
Harvard
L, 4-2
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
T, 3-3
L, 3-1
L, 7-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-3
L, 5-3
L, 3-2
XXX T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 5-0
L, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 5-3
Princeton
L, 4-0
L, 4-2
L, 2-0
W, 3-2
L, 2-0
W, 2-0
W, 5-1
W, 1-0
W, 3-2
W, 7-0
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
XXX W, 5-2
L, 3-0
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 3-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
Quinnipiac
L, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-0
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
L, 4-0
L, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 5-2
W, 3-0
XXX W, 2-0
L, 5-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
W, 1-0
Rensselaer
W, 1-0
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
L, 5-4
W, 2-0
W, 6-1
W, 6-0
L, 5-2
W, 3-0
L, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-2
L, 2-0
W, 5-1
XXX L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
St. Lawrence
L, 5-2
L, 4-2
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 5-3
L, 4-2
W, 3-1
W, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
XXX L, 1-0
L, 4-0
L, 3-1
L, 2-0
Union
T, 1-1
L, 3-2
W, 3-0
W, 4-0
W, 1-0
W, 1-0
W, 4-2
W, 8-0
W, 4-1
W, 5-1
W, 5-0
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 1-0
W, 4-0
XXX W, 4-1
W, 5-0
Yale

L, 4-0
L, 4-2
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 1-0
W, 5-0
W, 7-1
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 5-3
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
L, 1-0
W, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-1
W, 2-0
L, 4-1
L, 5-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.