2009-10 Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Cornell | 22 | 34 | 14-2-6 | 0.773 | 67 | 26 | 36 | 21-9-6 | 0.667 | 103 | 63 | 9-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 31 | 14-5-3 | 0.705 | 47 | 28 | 40 | 23-12-5 | 0.638 | 104 | 69 | 3-5-2 | Lost 2 | |
| Harvard | 22 | 29 | 13-6-3 | 0.659 | 69 | 40 | 33 | 20-8-5 | 0.682 | 94 | 54 | 6-3-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 29 | 11-4-7 | 0.659 | 44 | 28 | 37 | 19-10-8 | 0.622 | 79 | 51 | 6-2-2 | Lost 2 | |
| Rensselaer | 22 | 26 | 11-7-4 | 0.591 | 56 | 42 | 37 | 16-15-6 | 0.514 | 87 | 77 | 5-5 | Lost 1 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 26 | 11-7-4 | 0.591 | 52 | 42 | 31 | 13-14-4 | 0.484 | 72 | 70 | 4-5-1 | Lost 2 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 25 | 11-8-3 | 0.568 | 50 | 41 | 37 | 16-14-7 | 0.527 | 88 | 85 | 5-5 | Lost 1 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 20 | 8-10-4 | 0.455 | 51 | 68 | 36 | 12-20-4 | 0.389 | 86 | 129 | 5-5 | Lost 2 | |
| Dartmouth | 22 | 19 | 9-12-1 | 0.432 | 70 | 60 | 28 | 12-14-2 | 0.464 | 90 | 78 | 6-4 | Lost 1 | |
| Yale | 22 | 17 | 8-13-1 | 0.386 | 36 | 55 | 29 | 10-16-3 | 0.397 | 56 | 75 | 4-6 | Lost 3 | |
| Brown | 22 | 5 | 1-18-3 | 0.114 | 22 | 73 | 28 | 3-21-4 | 0.179 | 41 | 95 | 1-9 | Lost 1 | |
| Union | 22 | 3 | 1-20-1 | 0.068 | 14 | 75 | 34 | 5-28-1 | 0.162 | 36 | 110 | 0-10 | Lost 10 | |
Head to Head
Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
W, 1-0 W, 3-0 |
W, 4-2 W, 4-3 |
W, 5-0 W, 4-0 |
W, 5-2 W, 4-2 |
W, 5-1 W, 4-1 |
W, 5-0 L, 4-3 |
T, 0-0 W, 8-1 |
T, 1-1 W, 2-0 |
W, 3-1 W, 3-2 |
T, 0-0 W, 3-0 |
W, 3-0 W, 3-2 |
|
Clarkson |
L, 1-0 L, 3-0 |
XXX |
L, 4-1 L, 3-0 |
W, 2-0 L, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 4-1 |
L, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
L, 3-0 W, 1-0 |
L, 2-1 T, 1-1 |
T, 1-1 W, 3-1 |
L, 4-1 W, 4-2 |
L, 3-1 L, 3-0 |
L, 2-0 L, 3-2 |
|
Colgate |
L, 4-2 L, 4-3 |
W, 4-1 W, 3-0 |
XXX |
T, 3-3 W, 6-0 |
T, 5-5 L, 6-4 |
W, 2-1 W, 5-1 |
W, 3-2 L, 4-3 |
T, 1-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 10-4 L, 3-2 |
T, 2-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 4-0 L, 2-1 |
W, 3-0 W, 3-1 |
|
Cornell |
L, 5-0 L, 4-0 |
L, 2-0 W, 2-1 |
T, 3-3 L, 6-0 |
XXX |
L, 3-0 L, 3-1 |
L, 4-3 T, 4-4 |
L, 1-0 L, 6-0 |
T, 3-3 T, 0-0 |
L, 3-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 4-0 L, 6-1 |
T, 2-2 L, 1-0 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 5-2 L, 4-2 |
W, 3-1 L, 4-1 |
T, 5-5 W, 6-4 |
W, 3-0 W, 3-1 |
XXX |
W, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
L, 4-1 W, 4-3 |
W, 2-1 W, 2-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 5-2 |
L, 4-2 W, 4-3 |
L, 8-1 L, 4-0 |
L, 6-2 L, 6-3 |
|
Harvard |
L, 5-1 L, 4-1 |
W, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
L, 2-1 L, 5-1 |
W, 4-3 T, 4-4 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
XXX |
W, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
L, 7-2 W, 1-0 |
W, 4-2 W, 3-2 |
L, 3-0 L, 2-1 |
L, 4-0 L, 2-1 |
L, 5-0 L, 4-3 |
|
Princeton |
L, 5-0 W, 4-3 |
W, 3-0 L, 1-0 |
L, 3-2 W, 4-3 |
W, 1-0 W, 6-0 |
W, 4-1 L, 4-3 |
L, 2-1 T, 3-3 |
XXX |
T, 2-2 L, 1-0 |
T, 2-2 T, 1-1 |
W, 3-1 L, 3-0 |
L, 6-3 L, 3-0 |
L, 4-0 L, 4-0 |
|
Quinnipiac |
T, 0-0 L, 8-1 |
W, 2-1 T, 1-1 |
T, 1-1 L, 2-1 |
T, 3-3 T, 0-0 |
L, 2-1 L, 2-1 |
W, 7-2 L, 1-0 |
T, 2-2 W, 1-0 |
XXX |
L, 6-1 W, 1-0 |
T, 2-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 3-0 L, 3-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 1-0 |
|
Rensselaer |
T, 1-1 L, 2-0 |
T, 1-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 10-4 W, 3-2 |
W, 3-1 W, 2-1 |
L, 2-1 L, 5-2 |
L, 4-2 L, 3-2 |
T, 2-2 T, 1-1 |
W, 6-1 L, 1-0 |
XXX |
W, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
L, 2-0 L, 5-0 |
L, 4-1 W, 4-3 |
|
St. Lawrence |
L, 3-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 4-1 L, 4-2 |
T, 2-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 4-2 L, 4-3 |
W, 3-0 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 3-0 |
T, 2-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
XXX |
L, 3-1 L, 5-0 |
L, 4-0 W, 1-0 |
|
Union |
T, 0-0 L, 3-0 |
W, 3-1 W, 3-0 |
W, 4-0 W, 2-1 |
W, 4-0 W, 6-1 |
W, 8-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 4-0 W, 2-1 |
W, 6-3 W, 3-0 |
W, 3-0 W, 3-1 |
W, 2-0 W, 5-0 |
W, 3-1 W, 5-0 |
XXX |
W, 2-1 W, 3-0 |
|
Yale |
L, 3-0 L, 3-2 |
W, 2-0 W, 3-2 |
L, 3-0 L, 3-1 |
T, 2-2 W, 1-0 |
W, 6-2 W, 6-3 |
W, 5-0 W, 4-3 |
W, 4-0 W, 4-0 |
W, 2-1 W, 1-0 |
W, 4-1 L, 4-3 |
W, 4-0 L, 1-0 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-0 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Women's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins.
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
