2013-14 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS W-L PCT GP GF GA W-L PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
Union 37 18-3-1 0.841 22 83 42 32-6-4 0.810 42 160 90 10-0 Won 12
Colgate 29 13-6-3 0.659 22 72 59 20-14-5 0.577 39 108 104 6-3-1 Lost 2
Quinnipiac 28 12-6-4 0.636 22 78 43 24-10-6 0.675 40 141 81 4-5-1 Lost 2
Cornell 26 11-7-4 0.591 22 51 50 17-10-5 0.609 32 77 74 5-5 Lost 1
Yale 24 10-8-4 0.545 22 71 56 17-11-5 0.591 33 106 82 5-4-1 Lost 2
Clarkson 24 11-9-2 0.545 22 57 64 21-17-4 0.548 42 101 102 4-4-2 Lost 1
Rensselaer 21 8-9-5 0.477 22 57 57 15-16-6 0.486 37 104 100 4-4-2 Lost 2
St. Lawrence 18 7-11-4 0.409 22 70 78 15-19-4 0.447 38 122 131 4-5-1 Lost 2
Brown 17 8-13-1 0.386 22 48 62 11-17-3 0.403 31 75 87 2-8 Lost 4
Harvard 16 6-12-4 0.364 22 44 52 10-17-4 0.387 31 69 83 4-5-1 Lost 3
Dartmouth 16 7-13-2 0.364 22 51 72 10-20-4 0.353 34 84 115 5-4-1 Lost 2
Princeton 8 4-18 0.182 22 44 91 6-26-0 0.188 32 60 126 2-8 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 4-3
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
L, 6-3
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
L, 4-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-0
T, 3-3
L, 5-3
W, 4-3
W, 3-0
L, 3-1
W, 6-0
Clarkson
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
XXX W, 4-3
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 6-1
L, 2-1
W, 1-0
L, 4-3
L, 3-1
W, 6-3
T, 1-1
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 5-4
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
W, 5-0
W, 6-3
L, 3-2
Colgate
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
XXX T, 2-2
L, 6-1
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 6-1
W, 7-2
L, 3-1
W, 6-2
T, 1-1
L, 5-3
L, 7-3
L, 5-3
T, 4-4
W, 5-2
W, 4-1
Cornell
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 6-1
XXX T, 1-1
W, 1-0
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 4-1
W, 3-0
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
T, 4-4
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
Dartmouth
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 6-1
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
T, 1-1
L, 1-0
XXX L, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 5-4
L, 5-3
W, 3-1
W, 8-1
W, 7-1
W, 4-2
W, 8-5
L, 3-1
W, 7-2
W, 3-2
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
Harvard
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
W, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-0
XXX L, 5-3
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
T, 3-3
L, 2-0
W, 3-1
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
W, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-2
Princeton
W, 6-3
L, 3-2
W, 4-3
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 6-1
W, 4-2
W, 4-1
L, 5-4
W, 5-3
W, 5-3
W, 3-2
XXX W, 3-0
L, 4-3
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
W, 7-1
W, 5-0
W, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 5-2
W, 7-5
Quinnipiac
L, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 6-3
T, 1-1
L, 7-2
W, 3-1
L, 3-0
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 8-1
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 4-3
XXX T, 3-3
L, 6-2
W, 3-2
L, 8-0
W, 6-4
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-0
Rensselaer
L, 4-1
L, 3-0
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
T, 1-1
T, 3-3
L, 3-1
L, 7-1
L, 4-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-0
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 6-2
XXX L, 4-3
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 5-0
St. Lawrence
T, 3-3
W, 5-3
W, 5-4
W, 4-3
W, 5-3
W, 7-3
W, 5-2
T, 4-4
L, 8-5
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
T, 2-2
L, 7-1
L, 5-0
L, 3-2
W, 8-0
W, 4-3
L, 4-0
XXX L, 2-1
W, 6-2
T, 3-3
W, 4-2
Union
L, 4-3
L, 3-0
L, 4-3
L, 5-0
W, 5-3
T, 4-4
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
L, 7-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 4-3
L, 3-0
L, 3-0
L, 6-4
W, 2-1
L, 4-3
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
L, 6-2
XXX L, 5-3
L, 2-0
Yale
W, 3-1
L, 6-0
L, 6-3
W, 3-2
L, 5-2
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
L, 5-2
L, 5-2
L, 7-5
T, 3-3
W, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 5-0
T, 3-3
L, 4-2
W, 5-3
W, 2-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.