Scoreboard

 

2013-14 Standings

  Conference Overall
GP Pts Record Win % GF GA GP Record Win % GF GA Last 10 Streak
22 37 18-3-1 0.841 83 42 42 32-6-4 0.810 160 90 10-0 Won 12
22 29 13-6-3 0.659 72 59 39 20-14-5 0.577 108 104 6-3-1 Lost 2
22 28 12-6-4 0.636 78 43 40 24-10-6 0.675 141 81 4-5-1 Lost 2
22 26 11-7-4 0.591 51 50 32 17-10-5 0.609 77 74 5-5 Lost 1
22 24 10-8-4 0.545 71 56 33 17-11-5 0.591 106 82 5-4-1 Lost 2
22 24 11-9-2 0.545 57 64 42 21-17-4 0.548 101 102 4-4-2 Lost 1
22 21 8-9-5 0.477 57 57 37 15-16-6 0.486 104 100 4-4-2 Lost 2
22 18 7-11-4 0.409 70 78 38 15-19-4 0.447 122 131 4-5-1 Lost 2
22 17 8-13-1 0.386 48 62 31 11-17-3 0.403 75 87 2-8 Lost 4
22 16 6-12-4 0.364 44 52 31 10-17-4 0.387 69 83 4-5-1 Lost 3
22 16 7-13-2 0.364 51 72 34 10-20-4 0.353 84 115 5-4-1 Lost 2
22 8 4-18-0 0.182 44 91 32 6-26-0 0.188 60 126 2-8 Lost 2

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX W, 4-3
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
W, 5-1
W, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 2-1
L, 2-0
L, 6-3
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
L, 4-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-0
T, 3-3
L, 5-3
W, 4-3
W, 3-0
L, 3-1
W, 6-0
Clarkson
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
XXX W, 4-3
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 6-1
L, 2-1
W, 1-0
L, 4-3
L, 3-1
W, 6-3
T, 1-1
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 5-4
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
W, 5-0
W, 6-3
L, 3-2
Colgate
L, 3-1
W, 5-2
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
XXX T, 2-2
L, 6-1
L, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 6-1
W, 7-2
L, 3-1
W, 6-2
T, 1-1
L, 5-3
L, 7-3
L, 5-3
T, 4-4
W, 5-2
W, 4-1
Cornell
L, 5-1
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 6-1
XXX T, 1-1
W, 1-0
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 4-1
W, 3-0
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-1
L, 5-2
T, 4-4
W, 3-0
W, 4-1
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
Dartmouth
W, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 6-1
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
T, 1-1
L, 1-0
XXX L, 2-1
W, 3-0
W, 5-4
L, 5-3
W, 3-1
W, 8-1
W, 7-1
W, 4-2
W, 8-5
L, 3-1
W, 7-2
W, 3-2
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
Harvard
W, 2-1
W, 2-0
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
W, 4-2
L, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-0
XXX L, 5-3
L, 3-2
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
T, 3-3
L, 2-0
W, 3-1
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
W, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-2
Princeton
W, 6-3
L, 3-2
W, 4-3
W, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 6-1
W, 4-2
W, 4-1
L, 5-4
W, 5-3
W, 5-3
W, 3-2
XXX W, 3-0
L, 4-3
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
W, 7-1
W, 5-0
W, 3-0
W, 3-0
W, 5-2
W, 7-5
Quinnipiac
L, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 6-3
T, 1-1
L, 7-2
W, 3-1
L, 3-0
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 8-1
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 4-3
XXX T, 3-3
L, 6-2
W, 3-2
L, 8-0
W, 6-4
L, 2-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-0
Rensselaer
L, 4-1
L, 3-0
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
T, 1-1
T, 3-3
L, 3-1
L, 7-1
L, 4-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-0
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 6-2
XXX L, 4-3
W, 4-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 5-0
St. Lawrence
T, 3-3
W, 5-3
W, 5-4
W, 4-3
W, 5-3
W, 7-3
W, 5-2
T, 4-4
L, 8-5
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
T, 2-2
L, 7-1
L, 5-0
L, 3-2
W, 8-0
W, 4-3
L, 4-0
XXX L, 2-1
W, 6-2
T, 3-3
W, 4-2
Union
L, 4-3
L, 3-0
L, 4-3
L, 5-0
W, 5-3
T, 4-4
L, 3-0
L, 4-1
L, 7-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 4-3
L, 3-0
L, 3-0
L, 6-4
W, 2-1
L, 4-3
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
L, 6-2
XXX L, 5-3
L, 2-0
Yale
W, 3-1
L, 6-0
L, 6-3
W, 3-2
L, 5-2
L, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
L, 5-2
L, 5-2
L, 7-5
T, 3-3
W, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 5-0
T, 3-3
L, 4-2
W, 5-3
W, 2-0
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.