2012-13 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS W-L-T PCT GP GF GA W-L-T PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
Quinnipiac 37 17-2-3 0.841 22 73 32 30-8-5 0.756 43 130 72 7-3 Lost 1
Rensselaer 27 12-7-3 0.614 22 61 49 18-14-5 0.554 37 106 88 7-3 Lost 1
Yale 25 12-9-1 0.568 22 60 62 22-12-3 0.635 37 107 96 8-2 Won 4
Union 24 10-8-4 0.545 22 64 52 22-13-5 0.613 40 123 85 7-3 Lost 1
Dartmouth 22 9-9-4 0.500 22 56 57 15-14-5 0.515 34 94 88 4-5-1 Lost 2
St. Lawrence 22 9-9-4 0.500 22 60 68 18-16-4 0.526 38 107 109 5-5 Lost 2
Brown 20 7-9-6 0.455 22 54 51 16-14-6 0.528 36 90 85 6-3-1 Lost 1
Princeton 20 8-10-4 0.455 22 52 60 10-16-5 0.403 31 72 89 3-6-1 Lost 2
Cornell 19 8-11-3 0.432 22 49 55 15-16-3 0.485 34 83 91 6-3-1 Lost 2
Clarkson 19 8-11-3 0.432 22 58 67 9-20-7 0.347 36 89 113 3-7 Lost 5
Colgate 15 6-13-3 0.341 22 52 66 14-18-4 0.444 36 109 102 1-9 Lost 5
Harvard 14 6-14-2 0.318 22 45 65 10-19-3 0.359 32 73 101 5-4-1 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 5-1
L, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
L, 5-2
L, 5-1
L, 4-1
T, 1-1
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-0
W, 4-3
L, 1-0
Clarkson
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
XXX W, 5-4
T, 4-4
W, 3-1
L, 6-3
W, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 5-1
W, 6-2
L, 7-2
L, 3-2
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
W, 6-2
W, 5-0
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
W, 4-0
L, 1-0
W, 3-1
Colgate
L, 2-1
W, 5-1
L, 5-4
T, 4-4
XXX W, 3-1
T, 2-2
L, 5-4
W, 5-4
L, 1-0
W, 4-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
Cornell
W, 3-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 6-3
L, 3-1
T, 2-2
XXX T, 1-1
L, 4-2
W, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 5-3
W, 1-0
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
Dartmouth
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 5-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-4
L, 5-4
T, 1-1
W, 4-2
XXX L, 3-2
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 4-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 7-4
W, 4-2
Harvard
L, 3-2
W, 5-2
W, 5-1
L, 6-2
W, 1-0
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
T, 1-1
XXX W, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 6-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
W, 6-2
W, 4-1
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
Princeton
W, 5-1
W, 4-1
W, 7-2
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 4-2
L, 5-3
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
XXX W, 3-1
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
T, 4-4
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
W, 4-3
Quinnipiac
T, 1-1
T, 3-3
L, 5-2
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 6-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
XXX L, 3-1
T, 1-1
L, 6-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-1
Rensselaer
T, 2-2
L, 5-1
L, 6-2
L, 5-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-0
L, 3-0
W, 4-0
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
T, 1-1
XXX L, 4-3
L, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 7-3
L, 6-1
L, 4-1
St. Lawrence
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-2
T, 3-3
W, 3-1
L, 4-2
L, 4-2
W, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 6-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 4-1
XXX L, 4-2
W, 5-1
W, 4-2
W, 5-3
Union
T, 3-3
L, 2-0
W, 2-1
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-1
T, 4-4
L, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 7-3
W, 4-2
L, 5-1
XXX T, 2-2
L, 4-2
Yale
L, 4-3
W, 1-0
W, 1-0
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 7-4
L, 4-2
L, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-2
L, 4-3
W, 6-2
W, 4-1
W, 6-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-2
L, 5-3
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.