2012-13 Standings

  Conference Overall
GP Pts Record Win % GF GA GP Record Win % GF GA Last 10 Streak
22 37 17-2-3 0.841 73 32 43 30-8-5 0.756 130 72 7-3 Lost 1
22 27 12-7-3 0.614 61 49 37 18-14-5 0.554 106 88 7-3 Lost 1
22 25 12-9-1 0.568 60 62 37 22-12-3 0.635 107 96 8-2 Won 4
22 24 10-8-4 0.545 64 52 40 22-13-5 0.612 123 85 7-3 Lost 1
22 22 9-9-4 0.500 56 57 34 15-14-5 0.515 94 88 4-5-1 Lost 2
22 22 9-9-4 0.500 60 68 38 18-16-4 0.526 107 109 5-5 Lost 2
22 20 7-9-6 0.455 54 51 36 16-14-6 0.528 90 85 6-3-1 Lost 1
22 20 8-10-4 0.455 52 60 31 10-16-5 0.403 72 89 3-6-1 Lost 2
22 19 8-11-3 0.432 49 55 34 15-16-3 0.485 83 91 6-3-1 Lost 2
22 19 8-11-3 0.432 58 67 36 9-20-7 0.347 89 113 3-7 Lost 5
22 15 6-13-3 0.341 52 66 36 14-18-4 0.444 109 102 1-9 Lost 5
22 14 6-14-2 0.318 45 65 32 10-19-3 0.359 73 101 5-4-1 Lost 2

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 2-1
L, 5-1
L, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 2-1
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
L, 5-2
L, 5-1
L, 4-1
T, 1-1
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-0
W, 4-3
L, 1-0
Clarkson
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
XXX W, 5-4
T, 4-4
W, 3-1
L, 6-3
W, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 5-1
W, 6-2
L, 7-2
L, 3-2
W, 5-2
W, 2-1
W, 6-2
W, 5-0
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
L, 2-1
W, 4-0
L, 1-0
W, 3-1
Colgate
L, 2-1
W, 5-1
L, 5-4
T, 4-4
XXX W, 3-1
T, 2-2
L, 5-4
W, 5-4
L, 1-0
W, 4-1
W, 4-0
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
T, 3-3
W, 2-1
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
W, 4-3
Cornell
W, 3-0
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 6-3
L, 3-1
T, 2-2
XXX T, 1-1
L, 4-2
W, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 5-3
W, 1-0
W, 4-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 3-1
W, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
W, 3-2
W, 2-1
Dartmouth
L, 2-1
L, 4-2
L, 5-1
W, 4-0
W, 5-4
L, 5-4
T, 1-1
W, 4-2
XXX L, 3-2
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 4-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-2
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 7-4
W, 4-2
Harvard
L, 3-2
W, 5-2
W, 5-1
L, 6-2
W, 1-0
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
T, 2-2
W, 3-2
T, 1-1
XXX W, 3-2
W, 2-1
W, 6-2
L, 2-1
L, 4-0
W, 3-0
W, 4-3
W, 4-2
W, 6-2
W, 4-1
W, 5-1
W, 4-0
Princeton
W, 5-1
W, 4-1
W, 7-2
W, 3-2
L, 4-0
L, 4-2
L, 5-3
L, 1-0
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
XXX W, 3-1
W, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
T, 4-4
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
W, 4-3
Quinnipiac
T, 1-1
T, 3-3
L, 5-2
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 6-2
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
L, 3-0
XXX L, 3-1
T, 1-1
L, 6-2
W, 2-1
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-1
Rensselaer
T, 2-2
L, 5-1
L, 6-2
L, 5-0
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
W, 4-1
W, 4-0
L, 3-0
W, 4-0
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
T, 1-1
XXX L, 4-3
L, 4-1
W, 4-2
W, 7-3
L, 6-1
L, 4-1
St. Lawrence
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
L, 4-2
T, 3-3
W, 3-1
L, 4-2
L, 4-2
W, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
W, 6-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
W, 4-1
XXX L, 4-2
W, 5-1
W, 4-2
W, 5-3
Union
T, 3-3
L, 2-0
W, 2-1
L, 4-0
L, 2-1
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 4-2
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-1
T, 4-4
L, 3-2
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
L, 4-2
L, 7-3
W, 4-2
L, 5-1
XXX T, 2-2
L, 4-2
Yale
L, 4-3
W, 1-0
W, 1-0
L, 3-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-3
L, 3-2
L, 2-1
W, 7-4
L, 4-2
L, 5-1
L, 4-0
L, 4-2
L, 4-3
W, 6-2
W, 4-1
W, 6-1
W, 4-1
L, 4-2
L, 5-3
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.