2012-13 Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 37 | 17-2-3 | 0.841 | 73 | 32 | 43 | 30-8-5 | 0.756 | 130 | 72 | 7-3 | Lost 1 | |
| Rensselaer | 22 | 27 | 12-7-3 | 0.614 | 61 | 49 | 37 | 18-14-5 | 0.554 | 106 | 88 | 7-3 | Lost 1 | |
| Yale | 22 | 25 | 12-9-1 | 0.568 | 60 | 62 | 37 | 22-12-3 | 0.635 | 107 | 96 | 8-2 | Won 4 | |
| Union | 22 | 24 | 10-8-4 | 0.545 | 64 | 52 | 40 | 22-13-5 | 0.612 | 123 | 85 | 7-3 | Lost 1 | |
| Dartmouth | 22 | 22 | 9-9-4 | 0.500 | 56 | 57 | 34 | 15-14-5 | 0.515 | 94 | 88 | 4-5-1 | Lost 2 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 22 | 9-9-4 | 0.500 | 60 | 68 | 38 | 18-16-4 | 0.526 | 107 | 109 | 5-5 | Lost 2 | |
| Brown | 22 | 20 | 7-9-6 | 0.455 | 54 | 51 | 36 | 16-14-6 | 0.528 | 90 | 85 | 6-3-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 20 | 8-10-4 | 0.455 | 52 | 60 | 31 | 10-16-5 | 0.403 | 72 | 89 | 3-6-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Cornell | 22 | 19 | 8-11-3 | 0.432 | 49 | 55 | 34 | 15-16-3 | 0.485 | 83 | 91 | 6-3-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 19 | 8-11-3 | 0.432 | 58 | 67 | 36 | 9-20-7 | 0.347 | 89 | 113 | 3-7 | Lost 5 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 15 | 6-13-3 | 0.341 | 52 | 66 | 36 | 14-18-4 | 0.444 | 109 | 102 | 1-9 | Lost 5 | |
| Harvard | 22 | 14 | 6-14-2 | 0.318 | 45 | 65 | 32 | 10-19-3 | 0.359 | 73 | 101 | 5-4-1 | Lost 2 | |
Head to Head
Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
T, 3-3 L, 3-2 |
W, 2-1 L, 5-1 |
L, 3-0 W, 4-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 4-2 |
W, 3-2 L, 5-2 |
L, 5-1 L, 4-1 |
T, 1-1 T, 3-3 |
T, 2-2 W, 5-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 3-2 |
T, 3-3 W, 2-0 |
W, 4-3 L, 1-0 |
|
Clarkson |
T, 3-3 W, 3-2 |
XXX |
W, 5-4 T, 4-4 |
W, 3-1 L, 6-3 |
W, 5-1 L, 4-0 |
L, 5-1 W, 6-2 |
L, 7-2 L, 3-2 |
W, 5-2 W, 2-1 |
W, 6-2 W, 5-0 |
L, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-0 |
L, 1-0 W, 3-1 |
|
Colgate |
L, 2-1 W, 5-1 |
L, 5-4 T, 4-4 |
XXX |
W, 3-1 T, 2-2 |
L, 5-4 W, 5-4 |
L, 1-0 W, 4-1 |
W, 4-0 W, 4-2 |
W, 3-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 2-1 W, 3-2 |
W, 4-2 T, 3-3 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-1 |
L, 4-1 W, 4-3 |
|
Cornell |
W, 3-0 L, 4-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 6-3 |
L, 3-1 T, 2-2 |
XXX |
T, 1-1 L, 4-2 |
W, 4-1 T, 2-2 |
W, 5-3 W, 1-0 |
W, 4-1 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 4-2 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-2 |
W, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 2-1 L, 4-2 |
L, 5-1 W, 4-0 |
W, 5-4 L, 5-4 |
T, 1-1 W, 4-2 |
XXX |
L, 3-2 T, 1-1 |
W, 2-1 T, 2-2 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
L, 4-0 W, 3-0 |
W, 4-2 L, 3-2 |
L, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 7-4 W, 4-2 |
|
Harvard |
L, 3-2 W, 5-2 |
W, 5-1 L, 6-2 |
W, 1-0 L, 4-1 |
L, 4-1 T, 2-2 |
W, 3-2 T, 1-1 |
XXX |
W, 3-2 W, 2-1 |
W, 6-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 4-0 W, 3-0 |
W, 4-3 W, 4-2 |
W, 6-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 5-1 W, 4-0 |
|
Princeton |
W, 5-1 W, 4-1 |
W, 7-2 W, 3-2 |
L, 4-0 L, 4-2 |
L, 5-3 L, 1-0 |
L, 2-1 T, 2-2 |
L, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
XXX |
W, 3-1 W, 3-0 |
T, 2-2 L, 4-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 3-2 |
T, 4-4 W, 3-2 |
W, 4-2 W, 4-3 |
|
Quinnipiac |
T, 1-1 T, 3-3 |
L, 5-2 L, 2-1 |
L, 3-2 L, 3-2 |
L, 4-1 L, 4-1 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
L, 6-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 L, 3-0 |
XXX |
L, 3-1 T, 1-1 |
L, 6-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 4-0 L, 3-2 |
L, 6-2 L, 4-1 |
|
Rensselaer |
T, 2-2 L, 5-1 |
L, 6-2 L, 5-0 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-2 |
L, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 4-0 L, 3-0 |
W, 4-0 L, 3-0 |
T, 2-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-1 T, 1-1 |
XXX |
L, 4-3 L, 4-1 |
W, 4-2 W, 7-3 |
L, 6-1 L, 4-1 |
|
St. Lawrence |
T, 3-3 L, 3-2 |
W, 4-1 T, 3-3 |
L, 4-2 T, 3-3 |
W, 3-1 L, 4-2 |
L, 4-2 W, 3-2 |
L, 4-3 L, 4-2 |
T, 3-3 L, 3-2 |
W, 6-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 4-3 W, 4-1 |
XXX |
L, 4-2 W, 5-1 |
W, 4-2 W, 5-3 |
|
Union |
T, 3-3 L, 2-0 |
W, 2-1 L, 4-0 |
L, 2-1 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-2 |
W, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 6-2 L, 4-1 |
T, 4-4 L, 3-2 |
W, 4-0 W, 3-2 |
L, 4-2 L, 7-3 |
W, 4-2 L, 5-1 |
XXX |
T, 2-2 L, 4-2 |
|
Yale |
L, 4-3 W, 1-0 |
W, 1-0 L, 3-1 |
W, 4-1 L, 4-3 |
L, 3-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 7-4 L, 4-2 |
L, 5-1 L, 4-0 |
L, 4-2 L, 4-3 |
W, 6-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 6-1 W, 4-1 |
L, 4-2 L, 5-3 |
T, 2-2 W, 4-2 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins.
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
