2011-12 Standings
| Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
| GP | Pts | Record | Win % | GF | GA | GP | Record | Win % | GF | GA | Last 10 | Streak | ||
| Union | 22 | 32 | 14-4-4 | 0.727 | 76 | 38 | 41 | 26-8-7 | 0.720 | 143 | 75 | 8-2 | Lost 1 | |
| Cornell | 22 | 30 | 12-4-6 | 0.682 | 66 | 46 | 35 | 19-9-7 | 0.643 | 100 | 79 | 6-3-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Harvard | 22 | 25 | 8-5-9 | 0.568 | 61 | 59 | 34 | 13-10-11 | 0.544 | 106 | 100 | 6-3-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Colgate | 22 | 23 | 11-10-1 | 0.523 | 72 | 67 | 39 | 19-17-3 | 0.526 | 121 | 113 | 3-7 | Lost 2 | |
| Quinnipiac | 22 | 23 | 9-8-5 | 0.523 | 60 | 57 | 40 | 20-14-6 | 0.575 | 122 | 98 | 5-4-1 | Lost 1 | |
| Yale | 22 | 22 | 10-10-2 | 0.500 | 74 | 61 | 35 | 16-16-3 | 0.500 | 123 | 106 | 6-3-1 | Lost 2 | |
| Clarkson | 22 | 22 | 9-9-4 | 0.500 | 57 | 60 | 39 | 16-17-6 | 0.487 | 105 | 109 | 3-6-1 | Lost 1 | |
| St. Lawrence | 22 | 21 | 10-11-1 | 0.477 | 50 | 64 | 36 | 14-19-3 | 0.431 | 88 | 120 | 6-4 | Lost 2 | |
| Dartmouth | 22 | 19 | 8-11-3 | 0.432 | 63 | 74 | 33 | 13-16-4 | 0.455 | 93 | 102 | 4-6 | Lost 2 | |
| Rensselaer | 22 | 17 | 7-12-3 | 0.386 | 43 | 61 | 39 | 12-24-3 | 0.346 | 78 | 111 | 5-5 | Lost 2 | |
| Princeton | 22 | 16 | 6-12-4 | 0.364 | 58 | 72 | 32 | 9-16-7 | 0.391 | 85 | 105 | 2-6-2 | Lost 1 | |
| Brown | 22 | 14 | 5-13-4 | 0.318 | 54 | 75 | 32 | 9-18-5 | 0.359 | 75 | 97 | 1-7-2 | Lost 2 | |
Head to Head
Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats| BRN | CLK | COL | COR | DAR | HAR | PRI | QUI | RPI | STL | UNI | YAL | |
|
Brown |
XXX |
T, 2-2 W, 3-1 |
W, 5-3 W, 7-6 |
L, 5-4 W, 5-2 |
W, 6-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 3-1 T, 3-3 |
W, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
T, 2-2 W, 4-1 |
W, 1-0 W, 3-0 |
L, 4-1 W, 5-3 |
L, 2-1 L, 3-2 |
W, 5-3 L, 6-4 |
|
Clarkson |
T, 2-2 L, 3-1 |
XXX |
W, 4-2 L, 2-1 |
T, 0-0 T, 1-1 |
L, 4-0 W, 6-4 |
W, 3-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 3-0 L, 3-2 |
T, 1-1 W, 7-6 |
L, 4-1 L, 3-2 |
L, 5-3 L, 4-3 |
W, 3-1 W, 5-2 |
L, 5-4 W, 5-1 |
|
Colgate |
L, 5-3 L, 7-6 |
L, 4-2 W, 2-1 |
XXX |
L, 2-1 L, 5-3 |
L, 4-0 W, 5-4 |
W, 4-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 4-1 W, 6-2 |
L, 3-1 W, 7-1 |
L, 8-3 W, 4-2 |
L, 6-2 W, 3-2 |
W, 3-1 W, 5-3 |
W, 2-0 L, 4-2 |
|
Cornell |
W, 5-4 L, 5-2 |
T, 0-0 T, 1-1 |
W, 2-1 W, 5-3 |
XXX |
L, 3-2 L, 4-3 |
L, 4-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 4-0 T, 3-3 |
L, 4-0 L, 3-2 |
T, 2-2 W, 2-1 |
L, 1-0 L, 4-3 |
T, 4-4 L, 3-2 |
L, 6-2 L, 4-2 |
|
Dartmouth |
L, 6-2 L, 4-1 |
W, 4-0 L, 6-4 |
W, 4-0 L, 5-4 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-3 |
XXX |
T, 3-3 T, 2-2 |
L, 5-3 T, 3-3 |
L, 5-4 W, 2-1 |
L, 4-3 W, 2-1 |
L, 3-1 W, 3-1 |
W, 7-1 W, 5-1 |
W, 5-4 W, 5-3 |
|
Harvard |
L, 3-1 T, 3-3 |
L, 3-2 L, 3-2 |
L, 4-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 4-2 T, 2-2 |
T, 3-3 T, 2-2 |
XXX |
W, 4-3 L, 4-3 |
T, 2-2 L, 6-3 |
T, 2-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 4-3 L, 4-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 2-0 |
L, 4-3 W, 7-1 |
|
Princeton |
L, 3-2 T, 2-2 |
L, 3-0 W, 3-2 |
W, 4-1 L, 6-2 |
W, 4-0 T, 3-3 |
W, 5-3 T, 3-3 |
L, 4-3 W, 4-3 |
XXX |
W, 5-2 W, 3-2 |
L, 5-3 L, 6-2 |
W, 3-2 W, 4-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 3-0 |
W, 6-2 W, 5-2 |
|
Quinnipiac |
T, 2-2 L, 4-1 |
T, 1-1 L, 7-6 |
W, 3-1 L, 7-1 |
W, 4-0 W, 3-2 |
W, 5-4 L, 2-1 |
T, 2-2 W, 6-3 |
L, 5-2 L, 3-2 |
XXX |
L, 3-2 L, 3-1 |
W, 1-0 W, 4-3 |
T, 2-2 W, 5-2 |
L, 2-1 T, 2-2 |
|
Rensselaer |
L, 1-0 L, 3-0 |
W, 4-1 W, 3-2 |
W, 8-3 L, 4-2 |
T, 2-2 L, 2-1 |
W, 4-3 L, 2-1 |
T, 2-2 T, 2-2 |
W, 5-3 W, 6-2 |
W, 3-2 W, 3-1 |
XXX |
W, 2-0 L, 4-0 |
W, 5-1 W, 5-1 |
W, 2-0 L, 2-1 |
|
St. Lawrence |
W, 4-1 L, 5-3 |
W, 5-3 W, 4-3 |
W, 6-2 L, 3-2 |
W, 1-0 W, 4-3 |
W, 3-1 L, 3-1 |
L, 4-3 W, 4-1 |
L, 3-2 L, 4-1 |
L, 1-0 L, 4-3 |
L, 2-0 W, 4-0 |
XXX |
W, 2-0 W, 6-0 |
T, 3-3 L, 4-3 |
|
Union |
W, 2-1 W, 3-2 |
L, 3-1 L, 5-2 |
L, 3-1 L, 5-3 |
T, 4-4 W, 3-2 |
L, 7-1 L, 5-1 |
T, 3-3 L, 2-0 |
T, 3-3 L, 3-0 |
T, 2-2 L, 5-2 |
L, 5-1 L, 5-1 |
L, 2-0 L, 6-0 |
XXX |
W, 4-0 L, 3-1 |
|
Yale |
L, 5-3 W, 6-4 |
W, 5-4 L, 5-1 |
L, 2-0 W, 4-2 |
W, 6-2 W, 4-2 |
L, 5-4 L, 5-3 |
W, 4-3 L, 7-1 |
L, 6-2 L, 5-2 |
W, 2-1 T, 2-2 |
L, 2-0 W, 2-1 |
T, 3-3 W, 4-3 |
L, 4-0 W, 3-1 |
XXX |
Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.
Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):
- Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
- Wins.
- Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
- Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
- Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
- Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
- Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.
In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.
