2011-12 Standings

  Conference
-
Overall
-
LEAGUE PTS W-L-T PCT GP GF GA W-L-T PCT GP GF GA L10 STRK
Union 32 14-4-4 0.727 22 76 38 26-8-7 0.720 41 143 75 8-2 Lost 1
Cornell 30 12-4-6 0.682 22 66 46 19-9-7 0.643 35 100 79 6-3-1 Lost 1
Harvard 25 8-5-9 0.568 22 61 59 13-10-11 0.544 34 106 100 6-3-1 Lost 1
Colgate 23 11-10-1 0.523 22 72 67 19-17-3 0.526 39 121 113 3-7 Lost 2
Quinnipiac 23 9-8-5 0.523 22 60 57 20-14-6 0.575 40 122 98 5-4-1 Lost 1
Yale 22 10-10-2 0.500 22 74 61 16-16-3 0.500 35 123 106 6-3-1 Lost 2
Clarkson 22 9-9-4 0.500 22 57 60 16-17-6 0.487 39 105 109 3-6-1 Lost 1
St. Lawrence 21 10-11-1 0.477 22 50 64 14-19-3 0.431 36 88 120 6-4 Lost 2
Dartmouth 19 8-11-3 0.432 22 63 74 13-16-4 0.455 33 93 102 4-6 Lost 2
Rensselaer 17 7-12-3 0.386 22 43 61 12-24-3 0.346 39 78 111 5-5 Lost 2
Princeton 16 6-12-4 0.364 22 58 72 9-16-7 0.391 32 85 105 2-6-2 Lost 1
Brown 14 5-13-4 0.318 22 54 75 9-18-5 0.359 32 75 97 1-7-2 Lost 2
* Tournament Champion
x - Clinched Playoff Berth
# - Indicates Tournament Seed
e - Eliminated from Playoff Contention

Head to Head

Please Read From Top to Bottom, Not Left to Right for Accurate Stats
  BRN CLK COL COR DAR HAR PRI QUI RPI STL UNI YAL
Brown
XXX T, 2-2
W, 3-1
W, 5-3
W, 7-6
L, 5-4
W, 5-2
W, 6-2
W, 4-1
W, 3-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-2
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-1
W, 1-0
W, 3-0

L, 4-1
W, 5-3
L, 2-1
L, 3-2
W, 5-3
L, 6-4
Clarkson
T, 2-2
L, 3-1
XXX W, 4-2
L, 2-1
T, 0-0
T, 1-1
L, 4-0
W, 6-4
W, 3-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-0
L, 3-2
T, 1-1
W, 7-6
L, 4-1
L, 3-2
L, 5-3
L, 4-3
W, 3-1
W, 5-2

L, 5-4
W, 5-1
Colgate
L, 5-3
L, 7-6
L, 4-2
W, 2-1
XXX L, 2-1
L, 5-3
L, 4-0
W, 5-4
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
W, 6-2
L, 3-1
W, 7-1
L, 8-3
W, 4-2
L, 6-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
W, 5-3
W, 2-0
L, 4-2
Cornell
W, 5-4
L, 5-2
T, 0-0
T, 1-1
W, 2-1
W, 5-3
XXX L, 3-2
L, 4-3
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 4-0
T, 3-3
L, 4-0
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
W, 2-1
L, 1-0
L, 4-3
T, 4-4
L, 3-2
L, 6-2
L, 4-2
Dartmouth
L, 6-2
L, 4-1
W, 4-0
L, 6-4
W, 4-0
L, 5-4
W, 3-2
W, 4-3
XXX T, 3-3
T, 2-2
L, 5-3
T, 3-3
L, 5-4
W, 2-1
L, 4-3
W, 2-1
L, 3-1
W, 3-1
W, 7-1
W, 5-1
W, 5-4
W, 5-3
Harvard
L, 3-1
T, 3-3
L, 3-2
L, 3-2
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-2
T, 2-2
T, 3-3
T, 2-2
XXX W, 4-3
L, 4-3
T, 2-2
L, 6-3
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
W, 4-3
L, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 2-0
L, 4-3
W, 7-1
Princeton
L, 3-2
T, 2-2
L, 3-0
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
L, 6-2
W, 4-0
T, 3-3
W, 5-3
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
W, 4-3
XXX W, 5-2
W, 3-2
L, 5-3
L, 6-2
W, 3-2
W, 4-1
T, 3-3
W, 3-0
W, 6-2
W, 5-2
Quinnipiac
T, 2-2
L, 4-1
T, 1-1
L, 7-6
W, 3-1
L, 7-1
W, 4-0
W, 3-2
W, 5-4
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
W, 6-3
L, 5-2
L, 3-2
XXX L, 3-2
L, 3-1
W, 1-0
W, 4-3
T, 2-2
W, 5-2
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
Rensselaer
L, 1-0
L, 3-0
W, 4-1
W, 3-2
W, 8-3
L, 4-2
T, 2-2
L, 2-1
W, 4-3
L, 2-1
T, 2-2
T, 2-2
W, 5-3
W, 6-2
W, 3-2
W, 3-1
XXX W, 2-0
L, 4-0
W, 5-1
W, 5-1
W, 2-0
L, 2-1
St. Lawrence

W, 4-1
L, 5-3
W, 5-3
W, 4-3
W, 6-2
L, 3-2
W, 1-0
W, 4-3
W, 3-1
L, 3-1
L, 4-3
W, 4-1
L, 3-2
L, 4-1
L, 1-0
L, 4-3
L, 2-0
W, 4-0
XXX W, 2-0
W, 6-0
T, 3-3
L, 4-3
Union
W, 2-1
W, 3-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-2
L, 3-1
L, 5-3
T, 4-4
W, 3-2
L, 7-1
L, 5-1
T, 3-3
L, 2-0
T, 3-3
L, 3-0
T, 2-2
L, 5-2
L, 5-1
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
L, 6-0
XXX W, 4-0
L, 3-1
Yale
L, 5-3
W, 6-4

W, 5-4
L, 5-1
L, 2-0
W, 4-2
W, 6-2
W, 4-2
L, 5-4
L, 5-3
W, 4-3
L, 7-1
L, 6-2
L, 5-2
W, 2-1
T, 2-2
L, 2-0
W, 2-1
T, 3-3
W, 4-3
L, 4-0
W, 3-1
XXX

Tie-Breaking Procedures for Championship Seeding

ALBANY, N.Y. -- Following are the ECAC Men's Hockey Championship policies pertaining to seeding and tie-breaking procedures.

Seeding for championship competition is based on total points accumulated during league contests. In the event teams are tied in the final regular-season standings, the following tiebreakers (listed in order of application) shall be used to determine seeding. (Note: Only League games apply):

  1. Comparison of game results between tied teams (head to head).
  2. Wins.
  3. Comparison of results of games against the top four teams.
  4. Comparison of results of games against the top eight teams.
  5. Goal differential in head-to-head competition.
  6. Goal differential in games against the top four teams.
  7. Goal differential in games against the top eight teams.

In the case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria will be used in order until a team, or teams, is separated from the pack. At that point, the process will begin anew to break the "new" tie. In other words, when a four-way tie becomes a three-way tie, the three-way tie is treated as a "new" tie and the process begins with the first criterion.